USA – NEW YORK Trends and Developments Contributed by: Aaron Bourke, Tom Scriven, Bjorn Sorenson and Joshua Teitelbaum, RPCK Rastegar Panchal
Public-private programmes such as the Small Busi - ness Investment Company (SBIC) regime illustrate how blended approaches can become institutional - ised. SBICs combine private capital with government leverage, and financial institutions receive Community Reinvestment Act credit for qualifying investments. The more recent “reinvestor” licence pathway further channels capital to underserved managers, multiplying the programme’s reach. We are also seeing corporate- sponsored evergreen vehicles adopt similar blended features, where a strategic anchor provides downside protection or guaranteed offtake, allowing other inves - tors to participate at scale with greater confidence. Likewise, multilateral development banks have begun deploying guarantee facilities alongside traditional pri - vate credit funds, creating risk-sharing structures that open the door to new institutional entrants. Development organisations and other non-profits that historically have implemented economic development and delivered humanitarian aid through programmes funded by philanthropy and public sector dollars also are increasingly implementing investment strategies to further their development objectives. These strategies often are deployed through a partnership between a development organisation and an established invest - ment fund manager which jointly launches investment vehicles. These vehicles typically incorporate blended finance elements that serve to attract and aggregate capital from a diverse set of investors for investment strategies that aim to deliver both financial returns and positive environmental and social impact. As a result of the foregoing trends, the traditional line between “impact-driven” and “mainstream” funds is blurring. Blended structures are no longer the domain of mission-oriented investors alone; they are increas - ingly adopted by conventional fund managers as a pragmatic way to align diverse investors, unlock scale, and address mismatched risk and time horizons. In short, blended finance is shifting from exception to norm in the alternatives market. Evergreen and Semi-Liquid Structures The prominence of evergreen and semi-liquid struc - tures is also expanding. Interval funds, tender-offer funds, and open-ended vehicles are increasingly used in private credit, infrastructure, and other strategies
where flexible horizons and rolling subscriptions are advantageous. These vehicles are particularly attractive to high net worth and wealth-management channels, but insti - tutional investors are also showing greater interest where evergreen structures provide a better fit for long-duration assets. Key design features include rolling subscriptions and redemptions tied to NAV, liquidity management tools such as gates or proration, and incentive resets to maintain alignment. Regulatory expectations are rising. The SEC’s Market - ing Rule emphasises substantiated performance and fee disclosure. Amendments to Regulation S-P require incident-response programmes and breach notifica - tions. For evergreen funds that reach a broad investor base, valuation discipline, liquidity governance, and disclosure clarity are essential. Private Credit and the Expansion of Debt Funds Private credit remains the fastest-growing corner of alternatives. Investors continue to favour its consist - ent yields, shorter durations, and perceived downside protection. Fund structuring innovation is evident here. NAV financing, preferred equity facilities, and continuation annexes are increasingly layered into credit platforms. SBIC licensing continues to provide a compelling option for managers seeking leverage and CRA-moti - vated bank investors. In some cases, blended approaches are also being used in private credit, where catalytic tranches or guarantees facilitate participation by a wider range of investors. For mainstream asset managers, these tools can help overcome the structural barriers that often limit fundraising, such as mismatched risk appe - tites among LPs or the need to demonstrate scale to institutional allocators. By layering in concessionary anchors or credit enhancements, established spon - sors can bring new investor segments into their vehi - cles, accelerate time to close, and offer products that appeal across the risk/return spectrum.
340 CHAMBERS.COM
Powered by FlippingBook