PORTUGAL Trends and Developments Contributed by: Ana Reis Mota, Rogério Alves & Associados
expanded whistle-blowing channels, as detailed below. • The competition authority (AdC) maintains exter - nal and internal whistle-blowing systems, with a confidential, independent external channel and an internal reporting mechanism designed to protect whistle-blowers from retaliation. • Digitalisation of case management improves audit - ability and the integrity of enforcement operations. These channels support anti-corruption by facilitat - ing early detection of misconduct across markets and public procurement environments. AML-Related Preventive Registries Preventing corruption often overlaps with AML con - trols. Portuguese authorities have pursued consulta - tions and regulatory measures for registries of pro - fessional service providers to companies, reinforcing identification, oversight, and preventive mechanisms against illicit finance that co-occur with corruption. While the referenced consultation precedes 2024, its regulatory rationale remains pertinent to the devel - opment of registries and compliance frameworks expected in 2024–2028. As lobbying regulation introduces registries of influ - ence, parallel AML-style registries can synergise, enabling comprehensive transparency across high- risk interfaces. Enforcement, Prosecution and High-Profile Cases Legal reforms matter only if enforcement follows. Por - tugal’s criminal justice system has the capacity to pur - sue complex corruption cases, and prosecutors have pursued several notable investigations in recent years. High-profile political and ethical scandals ‒ some involving senior political figures or business interests linked to politics ‒ have put enforcement under the spotlight and generated intense public debate about impartiality and the political will to prosecute. Media coverage of such scandals has, in turn, contributed to the decline in public trust measured by international indices. A central challenge remains the length and complex - ity of investigations. Corruption cases often involve cross-border elements, complex financial engineer -
ing and long trails of subcontracting which demand specialised forensic accounting and international co- operation. Portugal has signalled stronger co-opera - tion with EU and international partners, but the tech - nical and resource constraints in public prosecution persist, and swift, high-quality case handling remains a bottleneck. Prevention Through Transparency and Open Data A conspicuous development is the increasing use of digital transparency tools and open data to pre-empt corruption. Digital portals for procurement, registers of public officials’ interests, and (proposed) registries of lobbying and beneficial ownership are intended to make it harder for corruption to hide in the shadows. Civil society organisations and investigative journalists have also used open data to trace suspicious deals and push for accountability. However, open data is not a silver bullet: its impact depends on data quality, user-friendliness and the legal framework that allows society and oversight bodies to act on the information. The “last mile” prob - lem ‒ turning published datasets into investigations and policy changes ‒ remains an implementation chal - lenge. International Co-operation and Standards Portugal’s trajectory is shaped by obligations and peer reviews from international organisations: OECD, GRECO (Council of Europe), the EU and bilateral part - ners. These actors provide comparative diagnostics, best-practice templates and pressure to align with international anti-bribery and integrity standards. Recent OECD country notes and GRECO follow-ups have both praised progress in some technical areas and urged stronger implementation and supervision. That external scrutiny is a major driver of the domes - tic policy agenda: the government’s Anti-Corruption Agenda and planned strategy explicitly reference
OECD and GRECO recommendations. Persistent Gaps and Political Economic Constraints
Despite measurable progress, a number of structural challenges persist. Public procurement complexity and subcontracting opacity create opportunities for preferential treatment and hidden value extraction.
195 CHAMBERS.COM
Powered by FlippingBook