USA – FLORIDA Trends and Developments Contributed by: Stuart Singer and Carl Goldfarb, Boies Schiller Flexner
that it was the purpose of [...] Article IV of the Constitution to prevent”; • Barnes Group, Inc v C&C Products, Inc , 716 F 2d 1023, 1032 (4th Cir 1983) – “[i]t was [an] error […] for the district court to apply Ohio law to deter - mine the enforceability of the Alabama salesmen’s covenants not to compete” in Alabama because restrictive covenants were against public policy in Alabama, while affirming application of Ohio law to enforceability issues in Maryland and South Carolina; and • Dresser Industries, Inc v Sandvick , 732 F 2d 783, 788 (10th Cir 1984) – the restrictive covenant could not be enforced under choice-of law-analysis against residents of states with public policies against restrictive covenants.
307 CHAMBERS.COM
Powered by FlippingBook