CYPRUS Trends and Developments Contributed by: Menelaos Kyprianou, Constantina Zantira, Andreas Lytras and Eleana Poulladou, Michael Kyprianou & Co LLC
within or outside Cyprus, on a specified person, or by a specified method set out in the contract. Under Part 6.9 (2), service effected in that agreed manner is deemed good and effective service, regardless of where the parties reside. This is an important provi- sion for jurisdiction and enforcement planning in inter- national contracts, as it strengthens the procedural effectiveness of service clauses and reduces depend- ence on more cumbersome foreign service mecha- nisms. Summary Taken together, the new provisions establish a mod- ern and commercially responsive regime for service of proceedings. The framework recognises party autonomy, accommodates the operational realities of international business and equips courts with practi- cal tools to ensure that proceedings can be validly and effectively brought even where the defendant is abroad or acts through local intermediaries. Management of Derivative Actions For the first time, the Rules provide a structured pro- cedural framework governing the commencement and continuation of derivative claims, including the requirement that the claim be expressly identified as a derivative action and that the company be joined as a defendant. Most significantly, Rule 20.13 introduces a permission stage, requiring the claimant shareholder to obtain the court’s leave to continue the claim beyond its initial filing. This represents a clear departure from the pre- vious procedural landscape, under which derivative actions were largely shaped by common law princi- ples rather than a dedicated procedural gateway. The introduction of a permission requirement effec- tively establishes an early merits-based threshold that claimants must satisfy before derivative proceedings can proceed. In practice, the court must be satisfied that there is a prima facie case and that the action is brought bona fide, in the interests of the company, rather than for collateral or tactical purposes. This pro- cedural filter is expected to discourage speculative or opportunistic litigation, while preserving the availabili- ty of derivative relief in cases involving credible allega- tions of breaches of duty or wrongdoing by directors
or controlling shareholders. As such, the Rules strike a balance between facilitating minority shareholder enforcement of corporate rights and protecting com- panies and defendants from unmeritorious claims. From a broader dispute-resolution perspective, these reflect the wider philosophy of enhanced judicial case management and early scrutiny of the viability of claims. By enabling the court to assess the legiti- macy of derivative actions at an early stage, the Rules promote procedural efficiency and proportionality in complex corporate disputes, while simultaneously providing greater clarity and predictability as to the circumstances in which derivative litigation may prop- erly proceed. ADR ADR and case management under the Civil Procedure Rules 2023 A notable feature is the introduction of a case man- agement stage, during which the court actively con- siders whether a dispute may be suitable for resolution through other mechanisms. Courts now have broader powers to assess the procedural trajectory of cases and determine whether ADR mechanisms are suitable. During the early stages of proceedings, the court may require parties to indicate their positions on the use of ADR mechanisms and whether efforts have been made to resolve the dispute without recourse to trial. This represents a significant cultural shift in the Cyp- riot litigation landscape. The new framework places the court in a more active role, encouraging the early identification of issues and the exploration of alterna- tive methods, where appropriate. This is particularly relevant in the context of arbitration agreements. Where a dispute arises in circumstances where the underlying contract contains an arbitration clause, the court may address this issue at an early stage, thereby avoiding unnecessary procedural steps and ensuring that the dispute proceeds in the agreed forum. In practice, this may lead to earlier applica- tions to stay court proceedings in favour of arbitration, reinforcing a generally arbitration-supportive judicial approach in Cyprus.
146 CHAMBERS.COM
Powered by FlippingBook