USA Law and Practice Contributed by: John D. O’Neill, Jr., David B. Horner, Andrej Micovic and Ryan Pedraza, Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP
6. Financing and Investment Structures 6.1 Infrastructure Financing Transportation infrastructure projects in the United States are financed through a combination of pub - lic funding, private capital and federal credit support. Financing structures vary depending on the nature of the project, the revenue model and the applicable pro - curement framework. For road P3 projects, financing consists of a combi - nation of sponsor equity, commercial bank debt, pri - vate placements, tax-exempt PABs and federal credit assistance. The Transportation Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act (TIFIA) programme remains one of the most important financing tools for large transpor - tation projects because it provides long-term subor - dinated financing on favourable terms. Traditional publicly financed projects rely on appropri - ated funds, federal grants, state transportation rev - enues, municipal bonds or dedicated tax revenues. Rail projects frequently utilise a greater proportion of public funding than toll road projects due to the absence of dedicated user-fee revenue streams. 6.2 Rolling Stock and Fleet Financing Rolling stock, locomotives and commercial vehicle fleets are commonly financed through a combination of secured debt, leasing arrangements, equipment trust structures and operating cash flows. Freight railroads frequently utilise equipment financ - ing, secured lending and lease arrangements for loco - motives and railcars. The substantial useful life of rail equipment supports long-term financing structures. Public transit agencies often finance rolling stock through municipal debt, federal grants and lease arrangements. Commercial trucking fleets are commonly financed through secured equipment loans, fleet leasing pro - grammes and manufacturer-supported financing arrangements. Fleet financing structures are designed to align repayment obligations with vehicle utilisation and replacement cycles.
construction, whereas concession agreements fre - quently extend for several decades. Road P3 concessions commonly range from approxi - mately 30 to 75 years. Availability-payment conces - sions fall towards the shorter end of that range, while revenue-risk toll concessions often require longer terms to support financing and revenue recovery. Rail concessions and operating agreements vary consid - erably depending on project scope and operational requirements. Termination provisions are among the most heavily negotiated aspects of transportation concessions. Agreements address contractor default, authority default, force majeure events, prolonged relief events and changes in law. Compensation mechanisms seek to balance protection of public interests with lender requirements and investor expectations. Modern con - cession agreements also commonly include lender step-in rights and cure periods designed to preserve project continuity. 5.5 Challenges and Remedies Unsuccessful bidders may challenge transportation procurement decisions through administrative, judicial or statutory protest procedures. The availability and scope of remedies depend on the applicable procure - ment framework and governing law. Bid protests frequently focus on alleged violations of procurement procedures, unequal treatment of bid - ders, conflicts of interest or evaluation errors. Courts and administrative bodies afford significant discretion to procurement authorities, particularly where evalua - tions involve technical judgements and complex infra - structure projects. Available remedies may include reconsideration of the procurement decision, corrective procurement proce - dures, injunctions or, in limited circumstances, mone - tary relief. In practice, transportation agencies seek to structure procurements carefully in order to minimise litigation risk and avoid delays to project delivery.
34 CHAMBERS.COM
Powered by FlippingBook