LUXEMBOURG Law and Practice Contributed by: Laure-Hélène Gaicio Fievez, Fabio Trevisan and Carolina Vasselli, BSP
5.3 The End of the Liquidation Procedure(s) Liquidation procedures in Luxembourg may conclude through various avenues, contingent upon the debt - or’s asset realisation and the extent of creditor satis - faction achieved. One primary outcome is the complete liquidation of the debtor’s assets. In this case, the debtor’s assets are sold, and the proceeds are distributed according to established priority rules. Secured and preferential creditors are paid first; if sufficient funds remain, unse - cured creditors ( créanciers chirographaires ) may also receive a portion of the distribution. These remain - ing assets are allocated among unsecured creditors according to their priority ranking. Once the full dis - tribution process has been executed, the court may officially close the liquidation, thereby ending the legal existence of the debtor. In instances where funds are insufficient to satisfy ordinary creditors fully, the liquidation procedure may conclude differently. Here, the juge-commissaire ‒ the judge overseeing the liquidation ‒ may declare that the available assets do not suffice to meet the unsecured creditors’ claims. The judge supervises the asset reali - sation process, organises creditor meetings if neces - sary and manages any arising concerns over the dis - tribution process. Upon confirming asset insufficiency, the juge-commissaire may authorise closure of the liquidation, thereby concluding the proceedings on the basis that no further distributions can be made to satisfy ordinary creditors. This type of closure under - scores the statutory priority of claims, ensuring that secured and preferential claims are addressed first. The Law of 7 August 2023, moreover, provides for the reopening of liquidation proceedings should previously unknown assets come to light after the procedure has concluded. Under Article 536-5 of the Commercial Code, if new assets are discovered post-closure, the public prosecutor has the authority to petition the court to reverse the closure. Upon reo - pening, the court appoints a judge-commissioner and additional liquidators, as necessary, to manage these newly identified assets. The liquidation process then resumes in a manner similar to the initial proceedings, prioritising the distribution of the new assets among the creditors.
Lastly, Luxembourg’s legal framework grants the pub - lic prosecutor the ability to intervene in liquidation pro - ceedings where fraudulent or unlawful activities are suspected. In such cases, irrespective of the debtor’s insolvency status, the prosecutor may petition for the company’s dissolution and liquidation to ensure com - pliance with criminal or commercial regulations. This judicial intervention applies to both domestic and for - eign companies operating within Luxembourg, there - by reinforcing corporate accountability and alignment with national legal standards. 5.4 The Position of Shareholders and Creditors in Liquidation In a liquidation context, shareholders generally lose any control over the company and typically have no say in the process. Their position is subordinate to all creditors, and they are entitled to any remaining assets only after all creditors have been paid. In prac - tice, shareholders rarely receive assets in liquidation, given that creditors are prioritised. Secured creditors maintain a high-priority status, which enables them to enforce their rights against the specific assets pledged as security. Luxembourg’s Commercial Code stipulates that secured creditors can pursue their claims directly against collateral with - out being significantly impacted by the liquidation’s collective nature. Any pre-existing liens and securities on assets are honoured, and the automatic stays that apply in restructuring may not restrict secured credi - tors in liquidation unless specified by the court. Unsecured creditors have a lower priority and are generally paid after secured creditors. However, they may still enforce rights like retention of title or set-off, subject to liquidation rules. While they have limited means to challenge or disrupt liquidation, they may file claims to the estate and participate in creditor meet - ings where applicable. 6. Cross-Border Issues in Insolvency 6.1 Sources of International Insolvency Law Luxembourg’s approach to international restructuring and insolvency law combines domestic legal provi - sions with EU regulations, notably the EU Insolvency
315 CHAMBERS.COM
Powered by FlippingBook