ECUADOR Trends and Developments Contributed by: Byron Robayo, Mario Cedeño and Lorena Sandoval Campaña, Estudio Spingarn & Marks S.A.
Latin America. That reality coexists with a profound, largely underexploited opportunity. The knowledge embedded in foreign patents filed in Ecuador – and in those that have lapsed or expired – is, for the most part, public information. System- atic analysis of this landscape allows actors to map the direction of the technological frontier in any given sector, identify which problems have been solved and which remain open, locate geographical gaps in com- petitors’ protection strategies and pinpoint inventions already in the public domain that can be legally imi- tated, improved upon or surpassed. Competitive IP intelligence goes further: it analyses the patent portfolios of competitors and relevant sector actors to identify coverage weaknesses and potential future moves. In sectors such as agrochemi- cals, pharmaceuticals and food technology, this anal- ysis can reveal differentiation opportunities not visible from the product perspective. Spingarn, through its innovation consultancy InnSpire Strategy & Innova- tion, has developed specific methodologies for this technology foresight work linked to natural resources and Andean productive sectors – translating patent data into actionable strategic insights for innovation investment decisions. Biodiversity as a latent IP asset The most striking case of underutilised patentable opportunity in Ecuador is its biodiversity. The country harbours a disproportionate fraction of the planet’s biological diversity within a relatively small territory – a wealth that represents a potential source of patentable innovation in pharmaceuticals, nutraceuticals, natu- ral cosmetic actives, biological agrochemicals and microbial bioprospecting across páramo , mangrove and Amazonian ecosystems. The gap between the resource and its legal exploita- tion is enormous. In most cases, it is foreign compa- nies and research institutions that identify, isolate and patent compounds derived from Ecuador’s endemic flora and fauna. Ecuador exports biological raw mate- rial and imports the resulting patented product, with- out capturing the value generated in the intermediate innovation process. Closing this gap requires both technical capability and the IP legal architecture to
protect what is discovered – two elements that are now within reach of domestic actors with the right advisory support. University–industry collaboration: an underbuilt bridge One of the most promising and underutilised vec- tors for IP generation in Ecuador is structured col- laboration between the private sector and universi- ties. Higher education institutions produce research in marine biology, biochemistry, agronomy and materials science that, with appropriate legal structuring, could translate into patentable inventions and technology transfer to the productive sector. The legal framework for this collaboration exists in the Organic Code of the Social Economy of Knowledge, Creativity and Innovation (the “Ingenios Code”), which establishes provisions on the ownership of inventions generated in research contexts and the mechanisms for transferring research outputs. Yet the gap between the regulatory framework and its practical application remains wide: few universities have operational tech- nology transfer offices, and only a handful of compa- nies have structured joint research agreements with well-designed ownership and licensing clauses. This is not primarily a legal problem – it is a structuring and advisory problem, and it is one that can be solved. Technology transfer: identify, structure, negotiate For companies not yet positioned to generate their own innovation in the short term, technology transfer – the formal acquisition of patents, licences or know- how from third parties – represents an equally strate- gic route. The first step is identifying which patents relevant to a given sector are available for licensing, which have been abandoned by their holders and which belong to actors willing to negotiate agree- ments for markets that are not their primary focus. A critical compliance element that many operators overlook, the Ingenios Code requires that IP licensing agreements be registered with the National Service of Intellectual Rights ( Servicio Nacional de Derechos Intelectuales – SENADI) for the associated royalty payments to be tax-deductible. Failure to comply generates consequences ranging from the loss of the tax benefit to a challenge of deductibility by the
100 CHAMBERS.COM
Powered by FlippingBook