ROMANIA Law and Practice Contributed by: Cosmin Vasile and Violeta Saranciuc, Zamfirescu Racoți Vasile & Partners
requests it. If not, the court will make a decision on the merits of the case.
tral award is prohibited from reviewing the merits of the dispute, with its examination being limited to the grounds for refusal of recognition and enforcement set out in the Code of Civil Procedure. The grounds for refusal of recognition and enforce - ment of the foreign award provided in the Code follow those established in the New York Convention, such as the parties did not have the capacity to conclude the arbitration agreement, the arbitration agreement was not valid or the award is in regard to a dispute that was not included in the arbitration agreement or exceeds the limits set by the arbitration agreement. As a matter of principle, filing a set-aside claim does not influence the enforcement procedure in any way. In other words, the enforcement procedure may com - mence and be continued even if a request to set aside the award was filed. However, following a request thereto, the court may suspend the enforcement of the award challenged with a set-aside claim if the debtor is about to suffer imminent and irreparable damage arising from the enforcement (eg, the debtor carries out a public interest activity that would be affected if the enforcement continued). The enforcement is with - held only until the ruling of the first court is issued. 12.3 Approach of the Courts The courts in Romania have a positive approach to the recognition and enforcement of arbitration awards and rarely refuse recognition and enforcement requests – in these cases, refusal is generally caused by pro - cedural non-compliance rather than substantial law infringement, such as public policy grounds. The Code of Civil Procedure refers to public policy in Article 1124, which sets out the legal grounds for the public policy exception as follows. Romanian legis - lature explicitly adopted the concept of international public policy, which is addressed as the “public order of the Romanian private international law”. In regard to the notion of public order of private international law, the Romanian courts overtly approach it as part of the Romanian legal order.
12. Enforcement of an Award 12.1 New York Convention
Romania ratified the New York Convention in 1961 by means of Decree No 186/1961, which came into force on 24 July 1961. Romania reserved the right to apply the Convention only to: • the recognition and enforcement of awards made in the territory of another contracting state; • awards made in non-contracting states subject only to reciprocity (to the extent to which those states grant reciprocal treatment); and • disputes arising from legal relationships – whether contractual or not – that are considered commer - cial under national law. Furthermore, Romania has signed multiple bilateral conventions with countries including Albania, Algeria, Belgium, Bulgaria, China, Cuba, the Czech Republic, France, Greece, Hungary, Italy, Moldova, Mongolia, Montenegro, Morocco, North Korea, Poland, Russia, Serbia, Slovenia, Slovakia, Syria and Tunisia. 12.2 Enforcement Procedure Domestic arbitral awards are treated and enforced in the same way as court decisions, whereas foreign arbitral awards are subject to recognition and enforce - ment proceedings before the Romanian courts. As a matter of principle, any foreign arbitral award is rec - ognised and may be enforced in Romania as long as the dispute is arbitrable according to Romanian law, and the award does not contain measures contrary to the public order of Romanian private international law. For recognition and enforcement of an arbitral award, the parties must comply with certain formal require - ments – they must file a request to this effect before a competent court and attach legalised or apostille- certified copies of the translated award and arbitration agreement. The court vested with hearing a request for the recognition and enforcement of a foreign arbi -
776 CHAMBERS.COM
Powered by FlippingBook