KUWAIT Law and Practice Contributed by: Michel Ghanem, Patrick Obeid and Michel Ata, Meysan
commonly as a WLL, the relevant terms are reflected in both the articles of association and, more sub - stantively, in a detailed joint-venture or shareholders’ agreement. The articles of association, while formally required, are largely system-generated by the MOCI and offer limited flexibility for amendment. As a result, the joint- venture or shareholders’ agreement plays a more criti - cal role, governing the relationship between the par - ties and addressing key commercial, financial, and operational matters. It also serves to fill any gaps left by the articles of association. In cases where the joint venture does not involve the incorporation of a separate legal entity, the joint-ven - ture agreement itself acts as the principal governing document, setting out the parties’ respective rights, obligations, and the governance framework for the venture. Key elements typically addressed in joint-venture agreements include a clear definition of the joint ven - ture’s purpose and business scope, along with the identification of each party’s capital contributions. The agreements set out detailed governance frame - works, including decision-making procedures, quo - rum requirements, voting thresholds, and a list of reserved matters that require either unanimous or super-majority approval. These agreements also often contain provisions for capital raising and financing, mechanisms to resolve deadlock situations, and the terms governing exit or dissolution of the joint venture by one or more parties. In addition, most joint-venture agreements provide robust clauses dealing with share transfers, such as pre-emption rights, rights of first refusal, drag-along and tag-along provisions, as well as call-and-put options in certain predefined events such as breach, insolvency, or change of control. Confidentiality undertakings, non-compete clauses, and exclusivity provisions are also frequently included to safeguard the competitive interests of the parties. In one example, a Kuwaiti shareholders’ agreement between a majority investor and a minority strategic
partner contained highly structured terms around business plan approvals, with the parties agreeing to annual strategy sessions to review performance and adjust targets. Key performance milestones were also contractually linked to additional capital calls and management incentive schemes. 6.2 Governance and Decision-Making The governance structure of joint ventures in Kuwait is generally aligned with the shareholding ratios of the parties, unless a key minority partner is involved. Governance is typically exercised through a board of managers or directors responsible for overseeing the operational and strategic affairs of the joint venture. Board composition and appointment rights are usually proportionate to each party’s equity stake. However, in cases where shareholding is unequal, it is common for minority shareholders to negotiate enhanced gov - ernance rights to protect their interests. In the context of WLL companies, Kuwaiti law does not provide for a board of directors. As such, joint- venture agreements often establish a contractual board of directors, accompanied by a detailed author - ity matrix, to ensure effective oversight and decision- making outside the statutory framework. Enhanced governance rights often take the form of veto rights or consent requirements over reserved matters. These typically include approvals for changes to the joint venture’s business plan or annual budget, issuance of additional shares, incurrence of significant indebtedness, appointment or removal of senior man - agement, and major capital expenditures. In some structures, a dedicated Operational Gov - ernance Committee (OGC) may also be established alongside the board. Comprised of representatives from each joint-venture partner, the OGC provides an additional layer of oversight and facilitates day-to-day co-ordination. Its responsibilities typically cover oper - ational matters such as execution of the agreed busi - ness plan, procurement decisions, technical inputs, and performance monitoring. This model is particularly effective where one party contributes specific industry know-how, proprietary
78 CHAMBERS.COM
Powered by FlippingBook