MEXICO Trends and Developments Contributed by: Gabriela Pellón, Cecilia Díaz-de-Rivera, Fabiola Jiménez and Lucía Ibáñez, Galicia Abogados
business lines, create holding vehicles, align tax and governance objectives, and prepare the group for investment, financing, sale or generational transition. Dynamic governance must also be capable of adapt - ing to the changing nature of the family’s wealth. A company that began in manufacturing, retail, phar - maceuticals, agriculture or real estate may evolve into a broader investment platform. As the original busi - ness becomes a smaller proportion of the family’s net worth, the family’s governance decisions broaden. They are no longer only deciding who runs the oper - ating company but rather who allocates capital, who approves diversification, how risk is measured and whether new ventures should be pursued through the common family structure or independently. Investment governance should not be overlooked. Family businesses increasingly require investment policies, approval thresholds, conflict-of-interest rules, related-party transaction policies and clear criteria for evaluating new projects proposed by family members. Without these rules, diversification becomes another source of tension. One branch may wish to preserve capital and receive distributions, while another may want to invest in new technologies, real estate, private equity or impact projects. The legal structure must make these choices discussable – and governable. Family protocols and family councils provide the softer – but indispensable – layer of governance. A well-crafted protocol can define the family’s values, the role of family members in the business, employ - ment policies, education expectations, dividend principles, conflict management procedures and the relationship between the family council and corporate bodies. However, to be effective and enforceable, it must be coordinated with the by-laws, shareholders’ agreements and fideicomisos , and must also include mechanisms for accession by younger generations and periodic reviews. Ultimately, institutionalisation and professionalisation are not designed to remove the family from the busi - ness. They are designed to allow the family to remain involved in a more sustainable manner. The objec - tive is to move from personal authority to institutional legitimacy, from informal expectations to documented
rules, and from reactive conflict management to pre - ventive governance. Section II: Orderly exit mechanisms – preserving value when continuity is no longer the best option If the first pillar of modern family business planning is dynamic governance, the second is the ability to sep - arate interests without destroying value. This requires a different mindset. Exit mechanisms should not be viewed as the failure of family unity, but rather as the tools that allow unity to remain voluntary, rational and fair. Families often speak of continuity as though it were a single objective shared equally by all members, but in practice it rarely is. For a founder, continuity may mean preserving the company name and family con - trol. For an active successor, it may mean leadership and reinvestment. For a passive shareholder, it may mean stable dividends. For a family member living abroad, it may raise tax or reporting complications that make ownership burdensome. For a younger gen - eration with different professional ambitions, it may be an emotional commitment – but not a desired life project. A mature governance architecture must recognise these differences. The question is not whether the family should stay together forever. It is under what conditions the family should continue to own together – and what should happen when those conditions are no longer met. Orderly exit mechanisms can be triggered by a wide range of events: strategic deadlock, sustained disa - greement over dividend policy, a change in control, breach of transfer restrictions, death, incapacity, divorce, tax inefficiency, relocation to another juris - diction, loss of interest in the business, or a decision by certain branches to pursue independent projects. The triggering events should be defined with enough precision to reduce disputes, but enough flexibility to respond to the family’s changing needs. Mexican law provides several effective tools. Manda - tory buy-sell rights can require one party to buy or sell shares upon specified events. Purchase and sale options can allow a shareholder to acquire or dispose
446 CHAMBERS.COM
Powered by FlippingBook