PORTUGAL Trends and Developments Contributed by: Miguel Durham Agrellos, Paulo da Rocha Pichel and Ricardo Pereira Amaro, Durham Agrellos
The list reaches across the Portuguese tax legislation, from income taxes to property levies. Aggravated tax - ation kicks in whenever a taxable event has a relevant connection to a listed place – and it kicks in mechani - cally. The mere domicile of the payer or issuer suffices; the investor’s motives are irrelevant, and no actual tax advantage need have been obtained. For personal income tax the punishment is stiff. Cap - ital income – interest, dividends, distributions from funds or fiduciary structures such as trusts – paid by entities domiciled in a listed jurisdiction suffers a 35% rate. So do capital gains on bonds, other debt securi - ties and fund units where the issuer is so domiciled, along with proceeds from the termination, liquidation, revocation or extinction of fiduciary structures. Worse, losses on such assets cannot be offset against tax - able gains: the investor swallows the downside whole while the upside is taxed at penal rates. In its current sweep, the order is a serious deterrent to investing in issuers from listed jurisdictions – and its drafting looks arbitrary. Some listed jurisdictions have concluded double taxation treaties with Portu - gal, complete with information-exchange clauses. Nor does the list stack up abroad: the European Union’s own roster of non-cooperative jurisdictions runs to just ten names, against Portugal’s 83.
Relief may be near. The government has said it plans to redraw the order in line with the criteria used by the European Union and the OECD. The exact terms are not yet public, but the direction is plain: a shorter, internationally aligned list, opening more of the invest - ment universe to Portuguese residents on tax-neutral terms. For portfolios shaped – and constrained – by the current list, this is one to watch. Allocations, issu - ers and fund domiciles once penalised may soon return to viability. Final remarks Taken together, these shifts point in one direction: reward long-term investment, tax real rather than illu - sory gains, and bring Portugal’s defensive measures into line with international norms. The framework for taxing financial assets is anything but static – it is being actively reshaped by the legislature, tested in the courts and recalibrated against European Union and OECD benchmarks. The message for private clients is simple. Existing wealth-holding structures deserve a fresh look. The timing of disposals, the holding period of each posi - tion, the domicile of issuers and funds within a portfo - lio – all now materially move the needle. A review with specialist advice, ideally before disposals rather than after, remains the surest way to preserve and grow family wealth in this new landscape.
566 CHAMBERS.COM
Powered by FlippingBook