INDONESIA Trends and Developments Contributed by: Vovo Iswanto, Albert Boy Situmorang, Wisnu Wardhana and Ingrid Gratsya Zega, Assegaf Hamzah & Partners
What business should anticipate in 2026 Indonesia’s halal product assurance regime is increas - ingly being enforced as a product integrity and con - sumer-protection framework, with regulatory expo - sure where businesses cannot substantiate halal claims across the supply chain. As the October 2026 deadline approaches, Indone - sia’s halal regulatory framework is entering a more comprehensive phase, characterised by an expand - ed scope of mandatory certification, growing inter - national recognition through MRAs, and more visible enforcement actions. For businesses operating in or exporting to Indonesia, halal compliance increasingly requires an integrated approach covering product formulation, supply-chain documentation, logistics, and importer arrangements. Early alignment with these expectations will be essen - tial as Indonesia moves towards full implementation of mandatory halal certification. Reciprocal Trade Agreement between the USA and Republic of Indonesia The Reciprocal Trade Agreement between Indonesia and the USA (“Trade Agreement”) represents a sig - nificant development in Indonesia’s bilateral relation - ship with the USA, moving beyond tariff adjustments towards a broader framework of regulatory coop - eration and market access. While the agreement is primarily economic in nature, its scope inevitably intersects with domestic regulatory regimes, includ - ing consumer protection law. Provisions relating to product standards, digital trade, market access for goods and services, and regulatory transparency have the potential to shape how consumer interests are safeguarded in an increasingly open and competitive market.
Through the Trade Agreement, Indonesia has commit - ted to removing tariff and non-tariff barriers, includ - ing recognising certain USA standards, and facilitating digital and cross-border trade. From the perspective of the CP Law, these commitments may enhance con - sumer welfare by increasing product availability and improving quality standards. At the same time, regula - tory alignment and trade facilitation may place pres - sure on domestic authorities to ensure that consumer protection rules, such as those on product safety, information disclosure, data protection, and product recall, continue to be effectively enforced. The agree - ment does not formally harmonise consumer protec - tion laws between the states, but it may influence the regulatory environment in which those laws operate. Ultimately, the impact of the Trade Agreement on the CP Law will depend not on the text of the agree - ment alone, but on how it is implemented in practice. This means the manner in which regulators interpret standards, exercise enforcement powers, and inte - grate consumer protection considerations into the broader framework will determine whether the Trade Agreement strengthens consumer welfare or exposes regulatory gaps. Accordingly, its implications will only be seen as the Trade Agreement moves from formal commitment to its implementation.
188 CHAMBERS.COM
Powered by FlippingBook