Real Estate 2026

USA – IOWA Trends and Developments Contributed by: Shannon M.H. Hasse, Dentons Davis Brown PC

negotiating tariff responsibilities when transferring a project. Strategic considerations Developers navigating tariff and supply chain chal - lenges should prioritise thorough due diligence related to equipment sourcing. In addition, contracts should address tariff risk allocation, specifying which party bears the cost of tariff increases imposed after con - tract execution or another date. Developers should evaluate domestic sourcing options, recognising that higher upfront costs may be offset by reduced tariff exposure and supply chain risk, and realistic timeline planning must account for extended lead times and potential delays. Local Opposition and Permitting Challenges While shifting federal policy and trade issues create significant headwinds for renewable energy projects, many developers find that their most immediate challenges arise closer to home. Local opposition to renewable energy projects has intensified across Iowa in recent years, transforming permitting and local approval processes that were once relatively straight - forward into protracted battles. The rise of local resistance Iowa communities that once welcomed wind and solar development have become more skeptical and, in some cases, staunchly opposed. Organised opposi - tion groups have formed in numerous counties, mobi - lising residents to attend local government meetings, speak against projects, and pressure county supervi - sors to deny permits or impose restrictive conditions. Social media has amplified these efforts, allowing such opposition groups to share tactics and messag - ing across jurisdictions. The reasons for this shift in local support are varied. Some opposition reflects genuine concern about potential property impacts or purported damage to the visual landscape; some reflects broader politi - cal polarisation around energy sources and climate issues; and some is driven by misinformation about health effects or property values. Regardless of the underlying motivations, the practical effect of the rise in local resistance to renewable energy projects is that developers and utilities can no longer assume or rely

upon community support. Instead, they must embrace robust community outreach efforts and be prepared to navigate formidable, often emotional, opposition. Zoning and setback requirements In response to constituent concerns, many Iowa counties have responded by adopting increasingly restrictive zoning requirements for renewable energy projects. Setback requirements, which set forth the minimum distance that a wind turbine or solar instal - lation must be located from property lines, residences, roads and other features, have been particular flash - points. Some counties have adopted setbacks that, while not explicitly prohibiting renewable energy development, effectively preclude it in large portions of the county. For example, a setback requirement of one mile from any inhabited dwelling can eliminate most potential project sites in a county with dispersed rural develop - ment. Height restrictions present similar challenges, as modern wind turbines have grown taller to capture stronger winds at higher elevations, and height limits set forth in older ordinances may no longer accom - modate current technology. Project developers must carefully analyse county ordinances before investing in site development, as restrictive provisions and other potential pitfalls may not be apparent upon initial review. This concern is intensified by the significant variance between indi - vidual county zoning ordinances across Iowa’s 99 counties. Common community objections In addition to analysing local law, understanding and empathising with the concerns most commonly raised by local landowners and residents helps developers and utilities prepare effective responses and miti - gation efforts. For example, property value impacts remain a persistent concern among renewable energy project opponents, although studies have generally found limited long-term effects on property values from nearby wind or solar installations. Furthermore, concerns regarding potential noise and shadow flick - er from wind turbines may prompt objections from neighbours concerned about quality-of-life impacts, and solar projects often face objections about poten -

821 CHAMBERS.COM

Powered by