KENYA Law and Practice Contributed by: John M. Ohaga, SC and Joy Wanyika, TripleOKLaw Advocates
players, referees, club officials, or intermediaries are induced to influence outcomes). • Anti-Corruption and Economic Crimes Act (Cap. 65): This creates and supports enforcement of cor - ruption/economic crime offences and investigative powers. It is relevant where match manipulation involves corrupt benefit, abuse of office, or eco - nomic crime features. • Penal Code (Cap. 63): This provides for core offences that can fit integrity/misconduct scenari - os, including obtaining by false pretences, cheat - ing, forgery/uttering, conspiracy, etc. These are often the “hook” for manipulation schemes (espe - cially where deception and benefit are involved). • Betting, Lotteries and Gaming Act (Cap. 131): This regulates betting and creates offences around unlawful betting/gaming operations and related misconduct. It is relevant when integrity offences are linked to betting markets and illegal betting activity. • Sports Act (Cap. 223) (governance and dispute resolution): While not a dedicated match-fixing criminal statute, it anchors Kenya’s sport govern - ance architecture and the Sports Disputes Tribunal (SDT), a key forum for sports-disciplinary disputes and appeals (including integrity-related disputes where rules allow). Even where criminal prosecution is difficult/slow, sports bodies typically act through sporting discipline and integrity controls, for example: • integrity investigations and provisional suspensions pending inquiry (to protect competitions); eg: (a) Football Kenya Federation (FKF) provisionally suspended Harambee Stars/Kakamega Home - boyz goalkeeper Patrick Matasi for 90 days over alleged match manipulation as investiga - tions proceeded; • co-operation with international integrity units (FIFA/ CAF/Integrity hotlines, data monitoring, disciplinary referrals); eg: (a) FIFA disciplinary action against a Kenyan club for match manipulation (see below); • internal disciplinary processes (disciplinary com - mittees, ethics codes, bans, deregistration/expul - sion from competition, point deductions, match replays, referee suspensions); eg:
(a) FKF has previously suspended multiple play - ers/coaches amid match-fixing allegations in the Kenyan league context; • preventive integrity programmes: education, codes of conduct, conflict-of-interest rules, mandatory reporting of approaches, restrictions on betting by participants, and integrity pledges (typically mod - elled on FIFA/CAF/IOC integrity frameworks). Recent Noteworthy Misconduct/Match-Fixing Cases Recent noteworthy cases include: • Muhoroni Youth (Kenya): FIFA sanctioned Kenya’s Muhoroni Youth (a lower-division club) for match manipulation, including expulsion/demotion conse - quences. • Patrick Matasi (Harambee Stars/Kakamega Home - boyz): FKF imposed a 90-day provisional suspen - sion and opened an investigation following allega - tions circulating publicly. • FKF suspended multiple players and coaches over match-fixing allegations (reported internationally). 1.3 Betting-Related Offences Betting is not illegal and is governed by the Gambling Control Act 2025. While the Gambling Control Act governs the conduct of betting operators and betting activities generally, sports governing bodies also impose integrity and betting-related behavioural rules on athletes and offi - cials under their own statutes, codes or disciplinary frameworks. In Kenyan football, the Football Kenya Federation has integrity rules that encompass match-fixing and manipulation, which can arise from betting-related conduct. In Kenya, there is no formal statutory regime that man - dates direct information exchange between betting operators and sports governing bodies on suspicious betting patterns. Sports governing bodies like FKF generally engage in internal integrity monitoring and reporting, and may
186 CHAMBERS.COM
Powered by FlippingBook