INDIA Law and Practice Contributed by: Safir Anand and Twinky Rampal, Anand and Anand Advocates
Trade mark counterfeiting is not defined or addressed in the Trade Marks Act 1999. However, Section 102 of the Act, which deals with “falsifying and falsely apply - ing trade marks”, covers such counterfeiting. In addition to trade mark infringement and passing off activities, a trade mark owner may seek criminal action against trade mark counterfeiting (civil actions). Sections 103 and 104 of the Trade Marks Act 1999 make it illegal to use and sell goods and services under false trade marks. The sentence might range from six months to three years in prison, with a fine. Further, even a quia timet action can be taken against counterfeits to restrain them in case of an anticipated risk. 8. Litigating Trade Mark and Copyright Claims 8.1 Special Procedural Provisions for Trade Mark or Copyright Proceedings In a landmark decision, with effect from April 2021, the country abolished the Intellectual Property Appellate Board (IPAB) and transferred jurisdiction of adjudicat - ing appeals to the High Courts. Subsequently, Delhi High Court formed a dedicated Intellectual Property Division to formalise and hear IP matters that had been pending before the IPAB. Delhi High Court cre - ated the Intellectual Property Division to deal with matters relating to IP rights, with which the aggrieved A trade mark registration establishes a legal presump - tion of the registrant’s ownership of the mark and the registrant’s exclusive right to use the mark nationwide on or in connection with the goods and/or services listed in the registration. 8.3 Costs of Litigating Infringement Actions Investigation fees, attorneys’ fees and expenses, notarisation fees, translation fees and court fees are all examples of usual costs. After a first-instance decision, litigation costs, including attorneys’ fees, are recoverable. However, there is no guarantee that a party against whom an injunction is obtained will parties can file their claims. 8.2 Effect of Registration
have to bear the expenses of litigation. The court has complete discretion over whether or not to award expenses. 9. Defences and Exceptions to Infringement 9.1 Defences to Trade Mark Infringement Defences available against infringement claims include the following: • delay and laches; • acquiescence; • honest and good-faith adoption and use; • differences in goods and services; • the nature of the product; • pricing; and • the absence of confusion or deception. Acquiescence may be considered a form of delay, although it has a more active element of knowledge of third-party rights coupled with delay. 9.2 Defences to Copyright Infringement (Fair Use/Fair Dealing) Section 52 of the Copyright Act 1957 details the provi - sions that allow for fair use: “ 52. Certain acts not to be infringement of copyright (1) The following acts shall not constitute an infringe - ment of copyright, namely – (a) a fair dealing with any work, not being a computer program, for the purpose of – (i) private or personal use, including research; (ii) criticism or review, whether of that work or of any other work; (iii) the reporting of current events and current affairs, including the reporting of a lecture delivered in public; Explanation – The storing of any work in any electronic medium for the purposes mentioned in this clause, including the incidental storage of any computer pro -
201 CHAMBERS.COM
Powered by FlippingBook