SOMALIA Law and Practice Contributed by: Fahad Arteh, Just Legal Services
issued by trial courts are reviewed by the ordinary appellate courts within the judicial hierarchy. Appeals may address both questions of law and, where permitted by procedural rules, questions of fact. The scope of review depends on the applicable standards governing appellate scrutiny. Copyright infringement decisions follow the same appellate structure as trade mark cases. As with trade marks, there is no separate appellate authority for copyright matters; appeals proceed through the general court system in accordance with established civil appeal procedures. 11.2 Timeframes for Appealing Trial Court Decisions The right to appeal arises once the trial court issues its final decision. The deadline for filing an appeal is determined by the general civil procedure rules, which set out the procedural time limits for lodging appeals. There is no statutory period within which an appel - late court must reach its decision. The duration of an appeal varies depending on factors such as the complexity of the case, the court’s workload, and the nature of the issues raised. In practice, appellate proceedings often take several months or longer to conclude. Somalia’s trade mark and copyright framework is based on longstanding legislation, most notably the Trade Marks Ordinance of 1955 and the Copyright Law of 1977. These laws continue to form the foundation of intellectual property protection in the country. As the legal and institutional landscape evolves, emerging issues are typically addressed through existing legal principles, giving courts and practitioners the flexibility to respond to new forms of commercial and creative activity. 12. Additional Considerations 12.1 Emerging Issues
Regarding artificial intelligence, Somalia currently has no specific statutory provisions or judicial guidance on the ownership of AI‑generated outputs or the use of copyrighted works in AI training. The Copyright Law is centred on the concepts of human authorship and originality, which therefore serve as the basis for ana - lysing questions related to automated or AI‑assisted content. In practice, matters involving authorship, ownership, or potential infringement arising from AI‑generated material would be evaluated under general copyright principles until further legislative or judicial clarification is provided. To date, there have been no reported landmark deci - sions or publicly known pending cases in Somalia addressing artificial intelligence in relation to trade mark or copyright law. As Somali courts confront these novel issues in the future, they retain the abil- ity to draw on comparative reasoning and persuasive authority from other jurisdictions where appropriate, while applying domestic legal principles to local cir - cumstances. 12.2 Trade Mark and Copyright Use on the Internet In practice, issues of online infringement in Somalia are handled under the general principles of intellectual property infringement, focusing on unauthorised use, deception, and resulting harm. There are no statu - tory obligations requiring online platforms or service providers to remove content upon receiving takedown notices, nor is there any formal system that makes trade mark or copyright registration a prerequisite for requesting content removal. Where online platforms operate within, or specifically target, Somalia, enforcement typically relies on con - tractual arrangements, platform‑specific policies, or court orders obtained through the standard judicial process. As a result, internet‑related infringement is treated as an extension of conventional infringement analysis rather than a distinct regulatory category.
488 CHAMBERS.COM
Powered by FlippingBook