Trade Marks and Copyright 2026

UAE Trends and Developments Contributed by: Maria Farrukh Khan, Syed Mubashir Ali and Muhammad Talal Farrukh Irfan Khan, United Trademark & Patent Services

• The mechanism: For an additional official fee (set at AED2,250), applicants can request an immedi - ate review of their application. The Ministry must issue an examination report, which will be either an acceptance or a provisional refusal, within one working day. • Commercial impact: This service fundamentally changes the “go-to-market” strategy for fast-mov - ing consumer goods (FMCGs) and technology sec - tors. Marketing teams can secure clearance imme - diately prior to major regional events like GITEX or Gulfood, rather than months in advance. The ability to secure a filing date and a provisional acceptance within 24 hours removes the uncertainty that previ - While the expedited service offers immense speed, it also compresses the window for error correction. In the traditional system, an examiner might catch and query a minor classification error or a vague specifica - tion over several months. With a 24-hour turnaround, the risk of an immediate provisional refusal increases if the application is not perfect upon submission. • Pre-filing due diligence: General counsels must ensure that the need for speed does not compro - mise the quality of the filing. A rigorous pre-filing audit is advisable. ously hovered over product launches. The strategic dilemma: speed vs quality • Specification clarity: All goods and services must comply with the latest Nice Classification adopted by the UAE. Vague terms like “retail services” with - out further qualification will likely trigger immediate objections. • Arabic transliteration: This constitutes a common pitfall for international brands. The Arabic translit - eration of the mark must be accurate and free from any negative connotations or conflicts with existing local marks. A clearance search that includes the Arabic script is strongly recommended before hit - ting the “expedited” button. Strategic implications for brand owners The availability of this service necessitates a change in filing strategy. General counsels should no longer view trade mark filing as a passive administrative step but as an on-demand commercial tool. The following strategic pivots are advisable.

• Defensive speed: In instances of potential bad-faith filings or leaks of a new brand identity, the expe - dited service allows legitimate owners to secure a priority date and examination result before infring - ers can react. This effectively weaponises the registration process against squatters. • Budgeting for velocity: While the expedited service attracts a premium fee, the cost of delay is sig - nificantly higher. The potential cost of rebranding due to a late refusal can be catastrophic. A trend whereby Tier 1 brands make expedited filing their default standard for the UAE, to match their global Parallel to the expedited service, the regulator intro - duced a bifurcated fee structure to stimulate local innovation. SMEs registered with the National SME Program now benefit from a 50% reduction in official fees. This lowering of the barrier to entry may lead to a surge in domestic filings. International brand owners must remain more vigilant than ever regarding “clut - ter” on the register. With lower costs for local start- ups, the volume of similar marks increases. pace of innovation, can be expected. The SME catalyst and fee bifurcation As an action item, trade mark “watch services” must be calibrated to detect phonetic similarities in Arabic, as many local SME filings appear in the local script. Litigation maturity: the structural shift to administrative resolution Perhaps the most profound change involves the migration of trade mark disputes from the courtroom to the administrative tribunal. This shift represents a maturation of the UAE’s legal system, moving towards a model that prioritises subject matter expertise and speed over formalistic judicial procedure. The Ministry as the first court Under the previous regime, cancelling a registered trade mark constituted a cumbersome process that required filing a civil lawsuit in the court of first instance. This involved significant court fees and lengthy ser - vice of process procedures, where it often took 12–18 months to reach a judgment. That judgment was then subject to two further rounds of appeal.

615 CHAMBERS.COM

Powered by