SPAIN Trends and Developments Contributed by: Carolina del Campo, Joan Hortalà, Jaime Collado and Pablo Álvarez, Cuatrecasas
Benchmarking and range defence It is necessary to present dispersion analysis and jus - tify narrowing to interquartile; if outside range, one should be prepared to justify using a point other than the median – or accept the median, depending on the facts. Year-by-year testing should be empha - sised in Spanish practice, and management should be informed throughout the year to avoid last-minute adjustments. Illustrative Scenarios and FAQs for Boards When is asymmetry in a cash pool defensible? Asym - metry is most defensible when the leader genuinely intermediates risk: it sets rates at discretion, manages counterparty and liquidity limits, takes treasury posi - tions with third parties and bears losses consistent with that role. Evidence includes policies, risk commit - tee minutes, external facilities referencing the leader’s role, and profit and loss reflecting spread-based remu - neration. Absent these, symmetry remains the safer anchor. Can LVAS be applied to analytics and optimisation services? Generally, the answer is no. These services typically rely on proprietary tools, scarce talent and control over economically significant risks; they fail LVAS eligibility. It is necessary to use robust bench - marking or profit methods, and to document why LVAS was excluded. Location savings should be treated as a comparability adjustment where they are material and persistent. One should quantify using wage differentials, pro - ductivity data and attrition rates – and explain how the savings are shared between service provider and recipient consistent with bargaining positions. What point within the range should be targeted? If in Spain and comparability defects persist, the median is commonly used for adjustments. It is necessary to proactively justify the target point with a narrative matching the functional and risk profile; if the upper quartile is sought due to higher risk or function, one should build a transparent quantitative case. Final Thought for Boards and Tax Leaders Spanish tax authorities and courts are sharpening expectations around accurate delineation, documen -
• consider rescue financing rules and state aid sensi - tivities for distressed contexts. Services operating model Here, it is important to: • build a services catalogue, benefit tests and alloca - tion matrices, with clear accountabilities; • use direct charge wherever feasible for specialist teams – for pooled costs, adopt allocation keys that correlate with benefits and are operationally auditable; • reserve the 5% LVAS mark-up for genuinely low- value activities and justify exclusions for higher value services; and • where services contribute to DEMPE, reflect that in pricing and residual returns. Intangibles discipline It is important to: • keep DEMPE maps current; • ensure agreements and cost sharing reflect control and capacity to bear risk; and • choose methods that match contributions. Where both sides contribute unique and valuable intangibles, it is advisable to: • consider bilateral methods and transparently model synergies and location savings; • build valuation files that include scenarios and sensitivities; and • reconcile outcomes to financial statements. Global mobility guardrails Here, it is necessary to: • track where senior people actually work, how often and on what decisions; • assess PE risks early; • align intra-group charges with the locus of control over economically significant risks; • prepare for audits by ensuring clear narratives on the allocation of functions and risks across bor - ders; and • co-ordinate with immigration and labour law to manage PE exposures.
245 CHAMBERS.COM
Powered by FlippingBook