UK Law and Practice Contributed by: Margherita Barbagallo, Sanskriti Mohta and Nilojana Nirmalan, Dragon Argent
Where a sale has been made by description, the Sale of Goods Act 1979 implies a term that the artwork will correspond with that description. If the work is declared inauthentic and therefore does not match the description given, the buyer may be entitled to reject the artwork and recover the full purchase price, and/or claim damages for the loss suffered. Claims under the Sale of Goods Act are generally subject to a six-year limitation period from the date of breach. Additional remedies may arise under the Misrepresen - tation Act 1967. If the buyer was induced to purchase by an untrue statement of fact made by the seller – for example, as to the artist or provenance – they may be entitled to rescind the contract and claim damages. This applies even if the statement was made inno - cently, though the remedy may differ depending on the seller’s state of knowledge. Where the buyer has relied on the assessment of an expert dealer or reputable auction house, there may be remedies available against them in the tort of negli - gence, if they failed to exercise reasonable care in their evaluation. For consumers, the Consumer Rights Act 2015 provides further statutory protections, including that goods must be as described and of satisfactory quality. In all cases, early legal advice is essential, as the choice of remedy and the applicable limitation periods will be highly fact-specific. There is no single, explicit legal definition of “cultural heritage” under English law. Instead, the concept is articulated through various statutes that protect differ - ent aspects of culturally significant property. The term most commonly appears in legislation implementing international conventions. The Cultural Property (Armed Conflicts) Act 2017, which implements the 1954 Hague Convention, defines “cultural property” broadly to encompass movable and immovable property of great importance to the cultural heritage of peoples. This includes mon - uments, archaeological sites, artworks, manuscripts, books, archives and scientific collections. The defini - 5. Cultural Heritage 5.1 Defining Cultural Heritage
tion is deliberately wide, reflecting the international consensus that cultural property deserves special protection. Beyond this statutory definition, the concept of cul - tural heritage is also given effect through designa - tion schemes. Assets may be “listed” under planning legislation, “scheduled” as ancient monuments, or designated as “pre-eminent” for the purposes of tax schemes such as Acceptance in Lieu (AIL). These mechanisms, while not providing a universal defini - tion, collectively identify what the UK legal system regards as worthy of special protection. The term operates less as a fixed legal category and more as a flexible concept shaped by the specific context in which protection is sought. 5.2 Cultural Heritage and Adverse Possession This question touches on deeply complex issues at the intersection of property law, public policy and his - torical justice. The peculiarities arise because cultural heritage items are not treated as ordinary property; their significance to communities and nations intro - duces moral and ethical dimensions that challenge conventional legal frameworks. A striking example concerns items acquired during the colonial era. Many objects now held in UK institutions entered the country under historical circumstances that were lawful at the time. Items such as bronzes, sculptures, manuscripts and ceremonial objects were brought to Britain by officials, archaeologists or sol - diers. Under the British Museum Act 1963, the trus - tees of that institution are constrained from deacces - sioning items except in very limited circumstances. They hold collections as custodians for the nation, not as owners with unfettered disposal rights. However, the law is slowly evolving to accommo - date moral claims that do not fit neatly within tradi - tional property principles. The National Heritage Act 1983 historically restricted deaccession by institu - tions. More recently, the Charities Act 2022 enabled non-national museums to transfer objects on moral grounds where they consider it appropriate. This pow - er was exercised promptly, leading to the return of six Benin Bronzes from the Horniman Museum to the Nigerian government. However, such ex gratia pow -
177 CHAMBERS.COM
Powered by FlippingBook