Art and Cultural Property Law 2026

GERMANY Trends and Developments Contributed by: Tanja Schienke-Ohletz, Flick Gocke Schaumburg

The ten-year commitment is regularly highlighted in professional practice as a decisive risk factor. Summary The transfer of art assets to the next generation is legally and economically much more complex than the transfer of other assets. Art is regularly high-priced, subject to value fluctuations and, at the same time, illiquid. Added to this are emotional, cultural and rep - utation-related factors. Inheritance law, compulsory portion law, tax law, foundation law and, where appli - cable, monument and cultural property protection law all intertwine. Without structured planning, conflicts of interest can quickly arise between preserving assets, tax optimisation and family security. A charitable foundation can be an effective instru - ment if the focus is on long-term preservation, public accessibility and reputation-building. It prevents the fragmentation of the collection and removes it from inheritance disputes. At the same time, it entails con - siderable commitments and does not automatically eliminate compulsory portion risks. A lack of liquidity planning can lead to pressure to sell, even with com - plete tax exemption.

The special tax exemption for cultural assets in the public interest also opens up scope for creativity out - side the foundation solution. However, it requires the active integration of art into a cultural context and is subject to strict retention and accessibility require - ments. The ten-year period represents a key risk fac - tor in this regard. Early, interdisciplinary succession planning is therefore crucial. Waivers of compulsory portions, execution of wills, liquidity provisions, clear valuation strategies and, where applicable, foundation law structures must be co-ordinated. Art succession is not an isolated tax issue, but a complex asset and governance decision that requires legal precision and strategic foresight.

61 CHAMBERS.COM

Powered by