USA – NEW YORK Trends and Developments Contributed by: Eleanor B. Alter, Adam John Wolff, Jenifer J. Foley and MaryJane Gurriell, Alter Wolff Foley & Stutman LLP
International child abduction and Hague Convention considerations
financial centres such as London, Geneva, Singapore, Dubai, or similar jurisdictions. Children may possess dual citizenship, foreign passports, and extensive international travel histories. These circumstances can make an international move appear far less disruptive than it would in a more conventional family structure. Even so, courts generally treat international reloca - tion as a significant event. Distance is only part of the analysis. International moves may implicate immigra - tion status, citizenship rights, educational systems, healthcare arrangements, jurisdictional concerns, and the enforceability of court orders. A destination country’s legal framework can become highly relevant when evaluating the long-term stability of a proposed relocation. Families sometimes assume that a child’s previous travel history supports relocation. While a history of international travel may help demonstrate familiarity with a destination, it does not necessarily establish that the child has a primary life there. Courts remain focused on the child’s routines and persistent connec - tions, including schooling, community ties, healthcare providers, and day-to-day activities. The most persuasive international relocation cases often involve substantial pre-existing ties. A child who has regularly spent significant time in London, attended school programmes there, developed family relationships there, and maintained a meaningful con - nection to the jurisdiction may present a far different case from a child whose connection consists primarily of vacation travel. Another increasingly important issue involves long- term viability. Courts may consider whether the relo - cating parent’s employment, immigration status, visa arrangement, or business structure can realistically support the proposed move over time. International relocation plans that depend upon uncertain future circumstances – such as what happens after a defined term for an assignment overseas – may receive height - ened scrutiny.
International mobility creates concerns that are large - ly absent in domestic relocation cases. Children in globally mobile families often possess multiple citi - zenships, multiple passports, residences in different countries, and regular access to international travel. While these characteristics may simply reflect the family’s lifestyle, they can also complicate custody disputes when parents disagree regarding interna - tional movement. The Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of Inter - national Child Abduction remains an essential compo - nent of international custody planning. The Conven - tion provides a mechanism for seeking the return of a child wrongfully removed from, or retained outside of, the child’s country of habitual residence. Importantly, Hague proceedings do not determine ultimate cus - tody rights. Instead, they generally address the return of the children to their habitual residence while those custody rights are being adjudicated. For families considering international relocation, the destination country’s relationship with the Hague Con - vention remains a significant consideration. The avail - ability of return remedies, the effectiveness of local enforcement mechanisms, and the legal treatment of foreign custody orders may all affect the risk profile associated with a proposed move. Recent New York decisions demonstrate that courts remain sensitive to legitimate concerns regarding international removal. In J . F . v E . G ., 87 Misc.3d 1219 (A) (Westchester County Sup. Ct. 2025), the court imposed substantial interna - tional travel restrictions after finding concerns regard - ing the mother’s efforts to obtain Russian passports for the parties’ children. The court limited international travel to the United States and Hague Convention sig - natory countries. The decision illustrates the degree to which passport issues, dual citizenship concerns, and international enforcement considerations can become central features of modern relocation litigation. Importantly, New York courts do not apply a categori - cal rule prohibiting relocation to countries that may
204 C HILD RELOC AT I ON 20 26
CHAMBERS.COM
Powered by FlippingBook