LIECHTENSTEIN Trends and Developments Contributed by: Lukas-Florian Gilhofer and Vivianne Auer, Ospelt & Partners Attorneys at Law Ltd.
cross-border conversions. A cross-border conversion enables a Liechtenstein capital company to transfer its registered office to another EEA member state without dissolution or liquidation, while maintaining its legal identity. This mechanism is distinct from asset transfers or liquidation-based migration models. The converting company remains the same legal person before and after the operation; only the applicable corporate law changes. From a practical perspective, cross-border conversions may serve a variety of legitimate purpos - es, including the relocation of central management, alignment with operational headquarters, regulatory repositioning, group restructuring or strategic expan - sion into new markets. The preservation of legal identity necessitates close co-ordination between the departure state and the destination state. The revised PGR addresses this through a structured certificate system and mandatory communication between the competent authorities of the relevant EEA member states. Procedural architecture and corporate governance requirements The revised PGR establishes a mandatory multi-stage procedure for all cross-border operations. The pro - cess begins with the preparation of draft terms (con - version, merger or division plans), which must con - tain detailed information on, inter alia, the legal form before and after the transaction, the proposed articles of association in the destination state, any exchange ratios, proposed cash compensation for dissenting shareholders, anticipated effects on employees and the indicative transaction timetable. Management is also required to prepare a comprehen - sive report addressed to shareholders and employ - ees explaining the legal and economic aspects of the transaction and its implications. This disclosure regime is designed to enable informed decision-mak - ing at shareholder level and to ensure transparency for affected stakeholders. In certain cases, an independent expert report is required, particularly in relation to valuation issues. While waivers may be available under specific con -
ditions, the default position favours independent scrutiny as a means of enhancing transparency and fairness. Shareholder approval requires a qualified majority, reflecting the structural significance of cross- border mobility decisions. The pre-transaction certificate as a central gatekeeping mechanism A defining feature of the revised regime is the require - ment that the Office of Justice issue a pre-conversion, pre-merger or pre-division certificate. This certificate confirms that all national pre-transaction requirements have been satisfied and constitutes a mandatory pre - requisite for registration of the transaction in the des - tination state. The certificate is not merely declaratory. It has con - stitutive effect: without it, the competent authority in the destination member state is legally precluded from completing the registration of the cross-border opera - tion. The certificate thus operates as a central gate - keeping device within the harmonised EEA system. The Office of Justice conducts a legality review focused on compliance with statutory requirements. This review encompasses procedural compliance, shareholder and creditor protection, employee infor - mation and participation requirements, and – where relevant – an anti-abuse assessment. While the review is legal rather than economic in nature, it is not purely formalistic. The authority must verify that protective mechanisms are substantively available and properly implemented. Once issued, the certificate is transmitted through the Business Registers Interconnection System (BRIS). The destination authority must accept it as conclu - sive evidence that departure-state requirements have been fulfilled and may not re-examine those aspects. This “once-only” principle enhances legal certainty and prevents duplicative scrutiny. At the same time, it concentrates procedural risk at the certificate stage: unresolved stakeholder issues may delay or block the transaction before it reaches the destination register. Abuse control and anti-circumvention review One of the most significant policy innovations reflect - ed in the revised PGR is the introduction of an explicit
771 CHAMBERS.COM
Powered by FlippingBook