LIECHTENSTEIN Trends and Developments Contributed by: Lukas-Florian Gilhofer and Vivianne Auer, Ospelt & Partners Attorneys at Law Ltd.
not grant creditors a veto right. Instead, it establishes a balancing mechanism between corporate mobility and financial stability. The preventive character of creditor protection is reinforced by procedural requirements at certificate stage. Management must certify that creditor claims have been adequately addressed. Without such con - firmation, the pre-transaction certificate cannot be issued. This shifts creditor risk assessment into the core transaction timetable and directly affects closing mechanics. In the context of divisions, creditor protection is com - plemented by specific liability allocation rules. Where liabilities are not clearly assigned in the division plan, residual joint and several liability applies, subject to a cap based on the net assets allocated to each entity. This mechanism incentivises precise ex ante alloca - tion and supports risk engineering strategies while safeguarding creditor interests. Employee information and participation Employee protection is ensured through information, consultation and participation rights. Management must inform employees of the proposed transaction, its legal and economic implications and its anticipated impact on employment. Where employee participation exists, the revised regime ensures continuity of participation rights. Cross-border mobility may not be used to undermine established co-determination structures. In certain cases, negotiation procedures or fallback mecha - nisms apply, and participation arrangements may be protected against dismantling for a defined period fol - lowing completion of the transaction. Employee-related issues may also constitute a trigger for abuse control, further underlining their systemic relevance within the revised framework. The new framework introduces: • Enhanced Information Rights: Employees must be informed about the proposed transaction and its implications in a timely manner.
• Consultation Requirements: In certain cases, com - panies will be required to engage in formal consul - tation processes with employee representatives. • Revised Participation Rules: The system governing employee participation in corporate decision-mak - ing will be updated to ensure continuity of rights across jurisdictions. Strategic assessment and conclusion The amendments to the PGR and the UMG imple - menting the Mobility Directive fundamentally mod - ernise Liechtenstein’s corporate mobility regime. The harmonised framework enhances predictability and aligns Liechtenstein with EEA standards. At the same time, the increased procedural intensity and formal - ised oversight mechanisms reflect a shift towards greater regulatory supervision of cross-border corpo - rate movements. For well-prepared companies pursuing genuine eco - nomic objectives, the revised regime offers expanded strategic flexibility. For poorly documented or artificial restructurings, it introduces meaningful safeguards and scrutiny. The reform reflects a mature balance between free - dom of establishment and regulatory responsibility and positions Liechtenstein as a legally robust juris - diction for cross-border corporate restructuring within the EEA. The changes are particularly relevant for businesses operating internationally or considering restructuring across jurisdictions. For clients, these developments represent both an opportunity to streamline cross- border operations and a need to carefully navigate enhanced compliance requirements. Understand - ing the practical implications of the new rules will be essential for effective transaction planning and execu - tion. For Liechtenstein, aligning with these standards enhances its attractiveness as a corporate domicile while reinforcing its integration into the European legal environment.
773 CHAMBERS.COM
Powered by FlippingBook