AUSTRIA Trends and Developments Contributed by: Martin Schiefer and Christian Richter-Schöller, Schiefer Rechtsanwälte GmbH
be prepared to explain their role, their pricing logic and their compliance arrangements in plain language. Integrity frameworks, documented anti-corruption controls and clean lobbying-register entries have become part of bid readiness. The scrutiny also has a productive side. It pushes the market towards professionalised procurement units, clearer specifications and better contract manage - ment, and it gives well-organised bidders an advan - tage over those relying on relationships. In a market that will spend historic sums within a few years, that discipline is in everyone’s interest. Financing and ESG: Defence Becomes Investable Again A quieter but equally important trend concerns money. For years, the ESG policies of banks and institutional investors treated the defence sector as adjacent to excluded activities, and Austrian suppliers regularly reported difficulties with financing, insurance and even basic banking services. This has changed. Secu - rity is increasingly framed as a precondition of sus - tainability rather than its opposite, exclusion policies are being recalibrated towards the genuinely prohib - ited categories such as controversial weapons, and European financial institutions are actively building defence exposure. The Austrian debate is now turn - ing to instruments: opening the facilities of the export credit agency OeKB to defence-related business, and pooling public and private capital in a vehicle for secu - rity and resilience investment. For companies, the practical consequence is that defence business is bankable again, but with enhanced documentation: financing agreements now routinely contain detailed sanctions, export control and end- use representations; and lenders expect to see the compliance infrastructure described above. An Aus - trian particularity adds a further layer: Section 320 of the Criminal Code (StGB) penalises certain forms of support for parties to an armed conflict from Austrian territory, including the supply and financing of military equipment, as a corollary of Austria’s permanent neu - trality. Austrian banks therefore assess conflict-related exposure of defence transactions with particular care, and end-use documentation frequently serves to dem - onstrate that a financing remains outside the scope
of Section 320. For contracting authorities, the same trend supports supplier resilience, which procurement law can reinforce through sensible security-of-supply requirements rather than through protectionism. A related development concerns talent and capac - ity. Defence suppliers compete for the same engi - neers, welders and software developers as the rest of industry, and delivery commitments in current ten - ders increasingly stand or fall with workforce plan - ning. Contracting authorities have started to ask for evidence of capacity, not only of capability, and financing banks ask the same question from the credit perspective. Human resources have quietly become a procurement and financing topic. Neutrality Under Discussion, Not Under Revision No account of the Austrian defence market is com - plete without the neutrality question, because inter - national partners regularly ask it. The constitutional position is stable: permanent neutrality is anchored in the Federal Constitutional Act of 1955, enjoys broad public support and is not up for revision in the cur - rent legislature. What has changed is the interpreta - tion. Neutrality is increasingly read as an obligation to maintain credible defensive capability, and as fully compatible with EU solidarity, joint procurement of defensive systems and participation in European defence-industrial programmes. Membership of a military alliance and the stationing of foreign troops remain off the table; buying, developing and produc - ing together do not. Neutrality in this reading does not require economic isolation. A restrictive applica - tion of export and criminal law provisions does not prevent defence business either; it moves production and financing to group companies abroad, and with them the jobs and the tax base. For contracts, neutrality has three concrete touch - points. • Export control – the statutory bar on war mate - rial deliveries into areas of armed conflict applies regardless of embargoes and must be reflected in supply commitments of Austrian-based production. • Programme participation – Austrian involvement in co-operative programmes is structured to preserve national decision-making over deployment and
32 D EFENCE CON TRACTS 2 026
CHAMBERS.COM
Powered by FlippingBook