BAHRAIN Law and Practice Contributed by: Noor Al Rayes, Mohamed Al Sari and Raghad Al Matrook, Al Tamimi & Company
4. Arbitral Awards 4.1 Legal Issues Concerning Enforcement of Arbitral Awards The Modern Legislative Foundation Enforcing an arbitral award in the Kingdom of Bahrain is governed by a highly progressive, arbitration-friend - ly legal framework. The cornerstone of this regime is Law No 9 of 2015 (the Arbitration Law), which adopted the UNCITRAL Model Law verbatim, signalling Bah - rain’s commitment to international dispute stand - ards. For international awards, Bahrain has been a dedicated signatory to the 1958 New York Conven - tion since 1988, applying it to commercial disputes on a reciprocity basis. This dual framework ensures that both domestic and international arbitral awards are recognised and enforced through streamlined channels, bypassing the heavy, merits-based judicial reviews that typically delay the execution of foreign court judgments. The Fast-Track Procedural Shift A major practical hurdle historically was whether or not enforcing an award required launching a slow, full- blown civil lawsuit. This procedural uncertainty was resolved by landmark rulings from the Bahrain Court of Cassation, which established that, under the Exe - cution Law, a creditor does not need to file a substan - tive lawsuit; instead, they simply submit an ex parte petition (a request for an enforcement order) directly to the High Court, attaching the original award and the arbitration agreement. This procedural shift success - fully converted what used to be a long litigation battle into a swift, administrative-style court order. The Principle of Absolute Finality To prevent losing parties from abusing the system, the Court of Cassation introduced a game-changing rule regarding appeals. Because the court’s decision to recognise an arbitral award is legally classified as an “order” rather than a “judgment”, a court order grant - ing the enforcement of an arbitral award is final and cannot be appealed, thereby shutting down standard debtor stalling tactics. While a debtor can still bring a separate, independent action to set aside or annul an award (if the seat of arbitration was Bahrain), they cannot appeal the enforcement order itself. Converse - ly, if the High Court refuses to enforce the award, it
must issue a reasoned “judgment” which is subject to appeal, protecting the creditor’s right to due process. Narrow Grounds for Refusal and Public Policy In line with Article V of the New York Convention and Article 36 of the Arbitration Law, Bahraini courts will only refuse to enforce an award under extremely nar - row, strictly defined circumstances, including proce - dural defects such as: • a party’s lack of capacity; • the invalidity of the arbitration agreement; • failure to provide proper notice of the proceedings; or • the tribunal exceeding its mandate. Substantively, the court will refuse enforcement if the dispute’s subject matter is non-arbitrable under local law or if the award directly violates Bahraini public policy or Islamic Sharia. 4.2 Variations in Approach to Enforcement of Arbitral Awards The procedural approach to enforcing arbitral awards is highly streamlined and unified under Article 3 of Bahrain’s Execution Law, which requires an expedit - ed, ex parte petition to be submitted directly to the High Court rather than a slow, formal civil lawsuit. However, the substantive rules, grounds for challenge and legal treatment vary significantly, depending on the classification, origin and nature of the award. For instance, while foreign commercial awards are gov - erned strictly by the 1958 New York Convention and can only be resisted on the highly narrow grounds of Article V, domestic awards rendered under the 2015 Arbitration Law are subject to local set-aside (annul - ment) proceedings in the Bahraini courts, although any court order granting enforcement for either type is final and non-appealable. This framework diverges further for awards issued by the GCC Commercial Arbitration Centre (GCCCAC) in Manama, which enjoy a privileged, supra-national status that allows them to bypass standard domestic annulment procedures entirely and obtain immediate, direct enforcement across all GCC member states.
37 CHAMBERS.COM
Powered by FlippingBook