BAHRAIN Law and Practice Contributed by: Noor Al Rayes, Mohamed Al Sari and Raghad Al Matrook, Al Tamimi & Company
• Uncontested and domestic (two to four months) – if the debtor is located in Bahrain and does not fight the enforcement, the process is incredibly fast. Since Bahraini courts recognise enforcement through an ex parte administrative petition rather than a full trial, the exequatur (enforcement order) can be issued within weeks. • Contested or foreign-serviced (six to 12+ months) – if the debtor resides outside Bahrain, serving them via formal diplomatic channels adds months of delays. Furthermore, if the debtor files an independent action to annul the award (if seated in Bahrain) or raises public policy objections, the court must schedule formal hearings, extending the timeline significantly. Strategic Options: Which Is Most Efficient? Choosing the correct forum and legal route dictates how quickly an arbitral award can be converted into liquid assets. • The GCC Commercial Arbitration Centre (GCC - CAC) path – if the award is issued by the GCCCAC (headquartered in Manama), this is the most effi - cient route available. Because these awards hold a unique, treaty-backed, supra-national status, they bypass standard local court annulment proce - dures entirely. They are deemed immediately final and directly enforceable across all GCC member states, making this the absolute fastest path to asset recovery. • The Bahrain Chamber for Dispute Resolution (BCDR) “Free Arbitration Zone” path – for high- value commercial disputes (exceeding USD1.3 million), choosing the BCDR offers unmatched procedural efficiency. By routing a dispute here, the entire enforcement and recovery process can be conducted fully in English. In addition, BCDR party agreement awards benefit from specialised “Free Zone” laws that completely block local courts from setting aside or interfering with the award, saving years of potential local litigation. • The New York Convention path (for Western awards) – when enforcing an award obtained in a non-treaty Western state (such as the US, UK or EU), relying on the New York Convention is highly efficient. While attempting to enforce a foreign court judgment from these jurisdictions is a slow,
uphill battle to prove reciprocity, arbitral awards bypass this process under the Convention. Fur - thermore, Bahraini precedent has established that a High Court order enforcing a foreign arbitral award is final and cannot be appealed. This effec - tively neutralises the debtor’s ability to drag out the process through the appellate courts. 4.6 Challenging Enforcement of Arbitral Awards Finality of the Award and Active Foreign Appeals Under Article 36 (1)(a)(v) of the Arbitration Law (mirror - ing Article V(1)(e) of the New York Convention), a debt - or can block enforcement by proving that the arbitral award has not yet become binding on the parties, or has been set aside or suspended by a competent authority of the country in which, or under the law of which, that award was made. • If an appeal or annulment proceeding is actively taking place in the foreign jurisdiction, it does not automatically freeze enforcement in Bahrain. However, the Bahraini court retains the discretion - ary power to adjourn/stay its enforcement decision pending the foreign outcome. • If the court chooses to adjourn the enforcement, it may, upon the creditor’s application, order the challenging debtor to provide appropriate secu - rity (such as a bank guarantee) to prevent stalling tactics. Public Policy and Sharia Objections The High Court will refuse enforcement of its own motion (under Article 36 (1)(b)(ii) of the Arbitration Law) if the award violates Bahraini public policy, pub - lic morals or mandatory principles of Islamic Sharia. Awards stemming from underlying transactions that are deemed illegal under Sharia or public policy (such as gambling or unlicensed financial trading) will be denied enforcement entirely. The Context in Which the Award Was Obtained A debtor can block enforcement by challenging the procedural integrity and context of how the arbitration was conducted, on the following grounds. • Invalidity of agreement or lack of capacity – the debtor can prove that a party to the arbitration
39 CHAMBERS.COM
Powered by FlippingBook