CANADA Law and Practice Contributed by: Lorne MacLean, KC, Fraser MacLean, Sophie Bartholomew and Rana Yavari, MacLean Law
Once issued in any jurisdiction, a child support order is enforceable throughout Canada. Child‑Initiated Financial Applications Under the federal Divorce Act, a child typically cannot apply for support independently; a parent or guardian must apply on their behalf. Some provinces, however, allow older children to be represented by a litigation guardian or lawyer. A child may apply for financial support directly in cer ‑ tain provinces, depending on age and capacity. This is generally available to mature teenagers, often around age 16 or older. A litigation guardian may represent the child and their interests. Courts ensure that any such application aligns with the child’s best interests and needs, while considering the financial circumstances of the parents and the nature of the relief sought. 3.3 Other Matters Authority of Family Courts in Canada In Canada, family courts have the authority to resolve disputes about a child’s upbringing when parents cannot reach agreement. This authority covers both day‑to‑day matters and major decisions, including issues related to schooling, medical care, religious participation, extracurricular activities, travel, and holiday arrangements. This power arises under the federal Divorce Act as well as provincial and territorial family law statutes. Courts may issue parenting or decision‑making orders that assign responsibility to one parent, require joint decision‑making, or divide authority by issue – such as granting one parent responsibility over education while the other retains authority for health‑related decisions. Courts may also intervene on a limited basis to resolve a single contested issue without alter ‑ ing the broader parenting arrangement. In exercising this authority, courts are guided by one paramount consideration: the child’s best interests. Judges assess the child’s circumstances, including developmental needs, each parent’s ability to sup ‑ port the child, historical caregiving roles, the level of conflict, the presence of family violence, and whether co-operative decision‑making is realistically possible. Although courts generally avoid ongoing involvement
in parenting decisions, they will intervene where per ‑ sistent conflict or risks to the child make judicial action necessary. Recognition and Judicial Treatment of Parental Alienation Canadian courts recognise that behaviours often described as “parental alienation” can occur, but they approach such allegations with caution and precision. Rather than relying on the label alone, courts focus on specific parental behaviours and their impact on the child. Judges typically examine whether a parent has engaged in actions that damage or undermine the child’s relationship with the other parent – such as persistent negative messaging, obstructing contact, emotional manipulation, or encouraging unjustified rejection. At the same time, courts remain attentive to situations where a child’s reluctance to engage with a parent may be grounded in legitimate concerns, including past harm, exposure to family violence, or the child’s own experiences. When assessing these issues, courts may consider: • the child’s behaviour and expressed views; • each parent’s conduct, communication style, and willingness to support the child’s relationships; • compliance with existing parenting arrangements or court orders; • expert or professional evidence where appropriate; and • any evidence of violence, coercion, or intimidation. If the court determines that alienating conduct is occurring and harming the child, it may implement measures such as counselling, therapeutic supports, or adjustments to parenting time or decision‑making authority – always guided by the child’s best interests. Participation of Children in Court Proceedings Children may provide evidence in Canadian family law cases, but courts take a careful and protective approach to how their views are obtained. It is rare for children to testify directly in open court, as this may expose them to emotional strain or place
78 CHAMBERS.COM
Powered by FlippingBook