USA – ILLINOIS Law and Practice Contributed by: Carmen D. Caruso, Bill Whitner and Gage Meyers, Carmen D. Caruso Law Firm
1. An Introduction to Franchising 1.1 Franchise Market Overview Illinois is a significant franchise market, supported by its diverse economy, strategic location and large consumer base, accounting for approximately 4% of all US franchise establishments. Chicago’s economic strength includes an average household income of USD159,231 and total annual consumer expenditure of USD38.04 billion. Key international and domestic franchise brands are active in Illinois. McDonald’s opened its first franchise restaurant in Des Plaines in 1955 and still maintains its global headquarters in Chicago. Starbucks has 164 Chicago-area locations, and Dunkin’ Donuts, 7-Eleven and Subway also maintain a strong presence. The market is particularly attractive for food service, retail and business services, and senior healthcare franchises are gaining traction due to the state’s aging population. However, Illinois has experienced a slight decline in franchise establishment growth, with pro - jections indicating a 2.4% decrease in 2025. In summary, Illinois offers a substantial, diverse fran - chise market with strong economic fundamentals, though declining establishment growth may temper future opportunities. 1.2 Franchise Regulation Franchising in Illinois is regulated at both the federal and state level. At the federal level, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC)’s Franchise Rule (16 CFR Part 436) requires franchisors to provide prospective fran - chisees with a Franchise Disclosure Document (FDD) containing 23 specified categories of information before any binding agreement is signed or payment is made. At the state level, Illinois is among the minority of states that impose franchise registration and disclo - sure requirements in addition to the federal statute. The principal sources of Illinois franchise regulation are: • the Illinois Franchise Disclosure Act of 1987 (815 ILCS 705/1 et seq) (IFDA), administered by the
Illinois Attorney General, which requires franchise registration and disclosure and provides substan - tive franchisee protections, including good-cause termination requirements, notice and compensa - tion requirements for non-renewal, and a private right of action; • the FTC Franchise Rule (16 CFR Part 436), which sets the baseline federal disclosure format that Illinois disclosure statements must follow; • the Illinois Antitrust Act (740 ILCS 10/1 et seq), which applies general competition-law principles to vertical restraints in franchise agreements; and • the Illinois Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Busi - ness Practices Act (815 ILCS 505/1 et seq), which may apply to misrepresentations in the franchise sales process independent of the franchise statute. Franchise relationships may also be shaped by gener - al Illinois contract and tort law, and by sector-specific statutes for regulated industries such as motor vehicle dealers and petroleum marketing, expressly carved out of the IFDA’s own definition of a franchise. 1.3 Definition of a Franchise Agreement Under Section 3 of the IFDA, a “franchise” is defined as a contract or agreement, whether expressed or implied, oral or written, between two or more persons, that satisfies the following three criteria: • marketing plan or system – the franchisee is grant - ed the right to engage in the business of offering, selling or distributing goods or services under a marketing plan or system prescribed or suggested in substantial part by the franchisor; • trade mark association – the operation of the franchisee’s business pursuant to a marketing plan or system that is substantially associated with the franchisor’s trade mark, service mark, trade name, logotype, advertising or other commercial symbol designating the franchisor or its affiliate; and • franchise fee – the person granted the right to engage in such business is required to pay, directly or indirectly, a franchise fee of USD500 or more. The statutory definition emphasises objective criteria rather than the parties’ subjective intent. Courts have consistently held that an agreement meeting these three elements constitutes a franchise under the Act
119 FRANCHISING 2026
C HAMBERS.COM
Powered by FlippingBook