USA Law and Practice Contributed by: Christina Hynes Mesco, Chad Ayers, Kristen Prinz and Amit Bindra, The Prinz Law Firm
need to defer certain investigatory steps to federal, state or local authorities. Separate considerations include whether the alleged conduct triggers manda - tory reporting obligations under applicable law and whether criminal charges or outcomes could impact employment decisions under “cause” provisions in employment agreements, incentive plans or policies. Employers should avoid providing legal advice to employees and should carefully manage confidential - ity, retaliation risk and due process concerns through - out the investigation, particularly if criminal charges are filed. To the extent that any law enforcement agen - cies request or subpoena records generated during an employer’s investigation, employers should rely upon advice of counsel as to whether and what materials to produce or withhold on the basis of such requests. 8.5 Multi-Jurisdictional HR Internal Investigations In multi-jurisdictional internal investigations, employ - ers should take additional steps to identify and com - ply with all applicable local laws governing employee rights, privacy, data protection and investigatory procedures. This includes understanding jurisdiction- specific requirements related to employee notice, interview practices, data collection and retention, recording consent, and protections for whistle-blow - ers or complainants. Employers should conduct a threshold legal assessment at the outset to determine which jurisdictions’ laws apply, based on employee location, where the conduct occurred, and where data is stored. Co-ordinating the investigation through experienced counsel is critical to ensure consistency while allowing for necessary local adaptations.
Cross-border investigations raise further considera - tions, particularly with respect to data transfers, attor - ney–client privilege and regulatory authority. Foreign employers conducting investigations involving US employees must comply with US federal and state employment and privacy laws, and US employers investigating conduct abroad may be subject to for - eign labour laws, works council requirements or data export restrictions, especially in the European Union. Employers should also be mindful of potential unau - thorised practice of law concerns, particularly in jurisdictions such as California, when non-lawyers or foreign counsel are directing or conducting inves - tigations that involve legal judgment. Best practice is to structure multi-jurisdictional investigations with centralised oversight, clearly defined roles and local legal input, and to rely on established professional resources and guidelines for cross-border investiga - tions to mitigate legal and operational risk.
436 CHAMBERS.COM
Powered by FlippingBook