USA Trends and Developments Contributed by: Christina Hynes Mesco, Chad Ayers, Kristen Prinz and Amit Bindra, The Prinz Law Firm
corporations. Amit has cultivated a specialised practice in restrictive covenants and trade secrets, and was a lead author of an amendment to the Illinois Freedom to Work Act that significantly reformed how restrictive covenants are litigated in Illinois. Amit is an active mediator and arbitrator, bringing a meticulous eye and measured approach to his work, and previously served as an adjunct law professor of appellate writing and oral advocacy at Loyola University Chicago School of Law.
The Prinz Law Firm 1 E. Wacker Drive, Suite 1800 Chicago, IL 60601 USA
Tel: +1 312 212 4450 Fax: +1 312 284 4822 Email: Mtedeschi@prinz-lawfirm.com Web: www.prinz-lawfirm.com
Not long ago, HR investigations were treated as a largely internal function – important, yes, but often procedural, predictable, and guided by well-worn playbooks. That era is over. Internal investigations in 2026 sit at the intersection of shifting enforcement priorities, rapid technologi - cal change, and evolving expectations about mental health, fairness and accountability. Decisions made in the early days of an investigation – who conducts it, what data is reviewed, how questions are framed, what language is used – can impact not only legal exposure, but also regulatory scrutiny, reputational risk and employee trust. Taken together, these trends demand more than incre - mental adjustments. They require a recalibration of how organisations think about internal investigations: not as HR exercises, but as legally consequential fact- finding processes that will be judged – by regulators, courts and counsel – through multiple, sometimes conflicting lenses.
For in-house and corporate counsel, the question is no longer whether investigations present risk, but whether existing approaches are equipped to man - age it. Understanding where the law is headed, where enforcement priorities are shifting and where tradition - al assumptions no longer hold is essential to protect - ing the organisation and the integrity of the process itself. What follows is a look at recent legal and practical developments reshaping HR internal investigations, and what they mean for employers navigating an increasingly complex landscape. Executive Orders, DEI and the EEOC Title VII of the federal Civil Rights Act of 1964 protects workers against discrimination, harassment and retali - ation in employment on the basis of protected charac - teristics: race, colour, religion, sex and national origin, with “sex” also covering pregnancy, sexual orientation and gender identity. The Equal Employment Opportu - nity Commission (EEOC) is the federal agency tasked with enforcing Title VII, as well as other federal laws
438 CHAMBERS.COM
Powered by FlippingBook