HONG KONG Law and Practice Contributed by: George Lamplough, Edward Beeley, Vanessa Cheng and Curtis Pak, Holman Fenwick Willan
Holman Fenwick Willan 22nd Floor, Alexandra House 18 Chater Road Central, Hong Kong SAR Tel: +852 3983 7788 Fax: +852 3983 7766 Email: reception.hongkong@hfw.com Web: www.hfw.com
1. Fraud Claims 1.1 General Characteristics of Fraud Claims It has been said that the many forms of fraud are as diverse as man’s infinite capacity to invent them (Grossman, 1993). Perhaps that is why in Hong Kong there is no overarching definition of “fraud”. The High Court of Hong Kong has described fraud as “a concept rather than a specific cause of action”, adding, “that is why one finds the word used in many and diverse cases, albeit as a shorthand expression, to refer to the different types of behaviour which are under scrutiny in each case”. Fraudulent activity may include deception, though that is not essential. There is usually financial loss to the victim, but not always. The elements of fraud are set out (though not specifically defined) in the Theft Ordi - nance (Cap 210), which makes it a criminal offence to induce another person by deception and “with intent to defraud” to do anything that results in either a ben - efit or a prejudice to another person. In the criminal jurisdiction, the legal concept of dis - honesty is complex because it is analysed from both subjective and objective standards: R v Ghosh [1982] QB 1053. It is subjective in the sense that the question is asked whether the defendant realised at the time they were being dishonest, and objective in the sense that the question is asked whether they were acting dishonestly according to the ordinary standards of reasonable behaviour. However, in the civil jurisdic - tion, the test is largely objective – see Royal Brunei Airlines v Tan [1995] 2 AC 378.
Fraud in Hong Kong In Hong Kong, fraud commonly involves the fabrica - tion or falsification of financial statements, which are either misrepresented or edited to omit key informa - tion. The goal is often to make a business appear more profitable than it is. To be convincing, the fraudster usually implements a fake paper trail of underlying contracts, invoices and payment receipts. This may involve setting up a series of supposedly unrelated companies that act as the “suppliers” and “customers” of the company, giving the impression that funds are flowing through the business. Funds can even be recycled in a “round- robin” scheme, enabling fraudsters to funnel the same cash through the business repeatedly, falsely driving up revenue figures and enhancing the apparent value of the company. Misappropriation of Funds Fraudsters look for ways to extract funds from busi - nesses that pass casual scrutiny. A company might purchase fixed assets or acquire a business at an inflated price from a connected company, or acquire a property in an obscure location, making it difficult to verify independently. Fraud Through Hong Kong Hong Kong banks are often unwitting participants in the money-laundering process. Victims fall foul of all sorts of deceptions, including email and phone scams, investment and wire frauds, and even impos - tor scams. There is also a constant stream of CEO frauds and frauds relating to investments in crypto - currency.
151 CHAMBERS.COM
Powered by FlippingBook