BULGARIA Trends and Developments Contributed by: Todor Banchev Todorov and Victoriya Grishina, Banchev and Grishina Law Firm
The NRA possesses extensive powers to moni - tor, inspect and restrict the movement of high-risk goods. The scope, determined by statutory criteria and administrative lists, typically includes: • fuels; • cars and car parts; and • construction materials. The classification remains dynamic, allowing adapta - tion to emerging risk patterns. Control measures may be carried out at multiple stages of the supply chain, including import, intra-EU acquisition, transport, storage and subsequent sales. Part of the enforcement toolkit is formed of: • real-time monitoring; • roadside inspections; vehicle or premises sealing; and • temporary detention of goods. • alcohol and tobacco; • agricultural products; • foodstuffs; In practice, fiscal control could serve as a gateway to broader VAT audits. Discrepancies between transport documentation, accounting records and VAT declara - tions may trigger extended investigations. With SAF-T implementation, physical control data can be cross- referenced with digital accounting submissions, rein - forcing integrated oversight. For businesses operating in logistics-intensive sec - tors, robust internal controls, synchronised documen - tation and early audit readiness are indispensable. The regime underscores the authorities’ preference for combining physical enforcement with digital analytics. EU Special VAT Scheme for Small Enterprises Effective 1 January 2026, Bulgaria introduced the EU Special VAT Scheme for Small Enterprises under Directive (EU) 2020/285. The regime reflects a broad - er EU objective of reducing compliance burdens for small businesses while facilitating cross-border eco - nomic activity within the internal market.
Eligible businesses with EU-wide turnover below EUR100,000 and domestic turnover below BGN100,000 (as national VAT exemption threshold) may apply a VAT exemption to domestic supplies and, subject to prior notification procedures, to certain intra-EU transactions without the need for multiple VAT registrations. The scheme introduces a simplified compliance environment and reduces administrative fragmentation for small operators engaging in cross- border trade. However, the regime is not purely beneficial. Busi - nesses applying the exemption are not entitled to deduct input VAT on related purchases. This creates structural considerations in sectors with higher input costs, capital expenditure or supply-chain integration. The choice to opt into the regime, therefore, requires a forward-looking assessment of cost structures, expected growth trajectories and margin sensitivity. Further risk arises from turnover monitoring. Exceed - ing the applicable thresholds triggers mandatory exit and application of the standard VAT regime, including registration and charging obligations. Where growth is not carefully tracked, businesses may face retroactive exposure or disputes regarding the timing of threshold exceedance and transitional obligations. Within the broader compliance landscape, the SME VAT Scheme interacts with SAF-T reporting and enhanced digital cross-checking mechanisms. Even exempt businesses remain subject to record-keeping obligations and data consistency requirements. As the NRA’s capacity for automated review increases, discrepancies between turnover reporting, intra-EU notifications and accounting data may generate audit scrutiny. Advisory engagement in this context typically involves: • eligibility assessments; • scenario modelling; • cross-border notification procedures; • internal monitoring frameworks; and • preparation for potential disputes arising from threshold breaches or reclassification.
85 CHAMBERS.COM
Powered by FlippingBook