BAHRAIN Law and Practice Contributed by: Rad El Treki, Noor Al Rayes, Aayush Kainya and Mohamed Al Sari, Al Tamimi & Co.
3.3 Mandatory v Voluntary Filing As mentioned in the foregoing, merger notification is strictly mandatory and suspensory for any transac - tion that qualifies as an economic concentration and meets the statutory market share thresholds. Even if a transaction does not technically hit the thresholds, filing (or at least seeking a formal no objec - tion letter) may be judicious in the following circum - stances. • Ambiguous market definitions: In niche or emerg - ing sectors – such as specialised healthcare or fintech – where market data is scarce, the CPA may define the market more narrowly than the par - ties do. If there is any risk that the CPA’s calcula - tion could push the parties over the 40% mark, a voluntary notification provides deal certainty and prevents a post-closing investigation. • Vertical integrations in sensitive sectors: If a deal involves an entity acquiring its own supplier or distributor (eg, a major food importer acquiring a retail chain), the CPA may investigate the deal ex officio (on its own initiative) even if market shares are low. This is particularly true in sectors linked to the gold licence initiative or national food and health security. • Transactions involving shadow managers: Under the 2025 corporate law amendments, if an acquisi - tion gives a foreign parent de facto control over a Bahraini entity without a majority of shares, the transparency requirements are now much higher. Filing ensures that the shadow manager status is disclosed and cleared upfront, mitigating future litigation risks. 3.4 Timing of Notification and Standstill Obligations Technically, there is no fixed post-signing deadline (eg, within 30 days of signing). Instead, the timing is dictated by the intended closing date. Once one files, a “standstill” or “suspension” period begins. During this time, the entities must remain entirely separate and independent in the market.
scrutinised under the rules prohibiting anti-competi - tive arrangements rather than merger control. Minority Acquisitions Acquiring a minority stake (less than 50%) is not exempt if it results in de facto control. If a minority shareholder is granted veto rights over strategic mat - ters – such as the business plan, senior management appointments or major investments – the transaction is viewed as a change of control. In the last year, the CBB has been particularly vigilant, requiring prior approval for any qualified participation of 10% or more in financial institutions, regardless of whether it carries board control. 3.2 Notification Thresholds As mentioned in the foregoing, the jurisdictional thresholds for merger control are primarily centred on market share and the concept of economic concen - tration rather than rigid transaction values or global turnover figures. Under the Competition Law, a man - datory notification is triggered if a transaction results in a change of control that creates or enhances a dominant position within the Kingdom. A dominant position is statutorily defined as a mar - ket share of 40% or more for a single undertaking, or a collective share of 60% or more for two or more undertakings (such as in a joint venture or a group acquisition). Additionally, the CPA exercises broad discretion to review any transaction that might “sig - nificantly reduce competition”. In practice, this means any deal where the combined entity would be the larg - est player in its niche is now being treated as de facto notifiable by sophisticated practitioners to avoid the risk of post-closing unwinding or fines of up to 10% of annual sales. It is important to distinguish the general competition regime from the stricter CBB requirements for the financial sector. For banks, insurance firms and invest - ment houses, the threshold is significantly lower: any acquisition of a “qualified participation” – defined as 10% or more of the shares or voting rights – requires prior written approval.
14 CHAMBERS.COM
Powered by FlippingBook