BAHRAIN Law and Practice Contributed by: Rad El Treki, Noor Al Rayes, Aayush Kainya and Mohamed Al Sari, Al Tamimi & Co.
civil compensation by invoking the general liability provisions of the Bahrain Civil Code. While the CPA focuses on administrative fines (up to 10% of sales) and procedural sanctions, a standalone civil suit would require the claimant to prove specific “harm, fault, and causation” – a high evidentiary bar for third parties or competitors. 10.2 Collective and Class Actions Bahraini law does not currently recognise collective redress mechanisms such as opt-out class actions or formal group litigation. Under the Civil and Com - mercial Procedures Law, litigation is primarily an indi - vidualist process based on the concept of “personal and direct interest”. While procedural joinder (Articles 60 and 61) allows multiple claimants with a shared legal cause to consolidate their claims into a single case, each claimant must be specifically named and represented, and the court renders its judgment based on the individual merits of each joined party’s position. In the context of M&A-related competition or regula - tory claims, there is no precedent for class-style suits; instead, enforcement is driven by the MOIC or the CBB acting in the public interest. While consumer groups or competitors can file admin - istrative complaints, any subsequent claim for dam - ages following a regulatory breach must be pursued by affected parties through individual or joined civil actions rather than a collective class vehicle. 10.3 Limitation Periods, Causation and Quantification Limitation questions often concern when time starts to run – whether from the date of the infringement, the claimant’s knowledge or the final regulatory decision – and whether limitation is suspended while regula - tory investigations or appeals are ongoing; causation requires claimants to show a sufficiently direct causal link between the regulatory breach or transaction misconduct (such as misrepresentation, information asymmetry or gun-jumping) and the specific loss suf - fered, which is frequently contested where multiple market or commercial factors intervene. Quantification of damages is often the most complex aspect, involving counterfactual analysis of what
would have happened absent the misconduct, the use of economic models and expert evidence to assess overpayment, loss of value or lost opportunity, and disputes over remoteness, mitigation, and whether losses are speculative or adequately proven. 10.4 Settlements, ADR and Arbitration For purely commercial disputes arising from M&A – such as breach of warranty or post-closing price adjustments – arbitration is the dominant standard due to private nature of the proceedings. However, for regulatory competition disputes (eg, challenges to a merger block by the MOIC), formal settlements are less common than in Western jurisdictions because the Competition Law is relatively young. While parties often engage in informal consultations or pre-notification discussions with the regulator to offer voluntary remedies (like divestitures) to secure approval, formal mediation of antitrust decisions is rare. Instead, if an impasse is reached, parties typi - cally pivot to the Administrative Court. 11. Outlook and Practical Guidance 11.1 Expected Legislative, Policy and Enforcement Developments Bahrain’s regulatory landscape is undergoing a sig - nificant transformation driven by the implementation of the National Cyber Security Strategy (2025–28) and a new wave of fiscal and corporate reforms. Inves - tors should anticipate more rigorous FDI screening for CNI as the National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC) formalises risk-based requirements for acquisitions in the energy, finance and telecommunications sectors. As mentioned in the foregoing, on the corporate front, recent amendments to the Commercial Companies Law have introduced the concept of “shadow manag - ers”, expanding personal liability for de facto directors and significantly affecting M&A litigation by broaden - ing the scope of fiduciary duty claims. Additionally, the launch of the BICC, with its unique transnation - al appeal mechanism to the SICC, is expected to increase the frequency of high-stakes M&A disputes being resolved via judicial proceedings rather than private arbitration. Finally, the 2027 roll-out of a 10%
24 CHAMBERS.COM
Powered by FlippingBook