Private Credit 2026

NORWAY Law and Practice Contributed by: Ida Marie Windrup, Daniel Jovanovic, Markus Nilssen and Steffen Rogstad, BAHR

6.5 Timing and Cost of Enforcement Timing

From an economic perspective, enforcement often destroys going-concern value, particularly for operat - ing companies, yielding substantially lower recoveries than negotiated restructurings. The act of enforcing can trigger customer and supplier disruption, with counterparties terminating contracts and key relation - ships unravelling, further eroding asset values. Addi - tionally, priority employee claims for unpaid salaries and pension arrears can significantly reduce secured creditor recoveries, while specialised or business- specific collateral may have limited secondary mar - kets in Norway, depressing realisable values well below original security valuations. To address these limitations, lenders adopt several protective strategies. They prioritise structuring secu - rity over financial collateral – such as shares and cash – to ensure enforceable rights even after insolvency proceedings commence. Tight financial covenant packages and early warning mechanisms enable lend - ers to identify deterioration before formal insolvency, while reserved matters and extensive information rights maintain visibility and control over the business. In practice, lenders generally favour consensual workouts and negotiated restructurings over formal enforcement where business value can be preserved. Norway has two main in-court insolvency processes: debt negotiations ( gjeldsforhandling ) and bankrupt - cy ( konkurs ). Debt negotiations have, for now, been replaced by a temporary Reconstruction Act which provides a flexible framework for businesses facing financial difficulties, allowing companies to file for reconstruction by submitting a petition to the court with details of their financial challenges and restruc - turing plan. Once opened, the reconstruction negotiations trigger an automatic stay that remains in effect throughout the process. This stay provides the debtor with pro - tection against certain actions initiated by creditors, including bankruptcy petitions, attachments, and enforcement proceedings. 7. Bankruptcy and Insolvency 7.1 Impact of Insolvency Processes

Enforcement timelines vary significantly depending on the method and whether the process is contested. • Financial collateral: days to weeks; out-of-court enforcement through appropriation or sale pursu - ant to the parties’ agreement is swift and efficient. • Uncontested security enforcement: two to four months; summary proceedings for undisputed claims with clear security can be relatively quick. • Contested enforcement: six to 18 months or longer; court proceedings involving disputes over security validity, valuation, or debtor challenges are substantially slower. • Insolvency scenarios: enforcement is typically stayed indefinitely once formal proceedings com - mence (except for financial collateral). Expedited Enforcement • Financial collateral arrangements: these provide the most effective expedited route, permitting self- help enforcement without court involvement. • Summary judgment procedures: these are available for undisputed claims, avoiding full trial proceed - ings. • Pre-insolvency action: swift enforcement before formal insolvency proceedings commence is criti - cal, as post-filing enforcement is severely restrict - ed. Costs Enforcement costs vary considerably, based on the form of enforcement and whether disputes arise. 6.6 Practical Considerations/Limitations on Enforcement Secured lenders in Norway face certain practical limitations that can constrain their ability or desire to enforce security. The most fundamental challenge is the insolvency stay: once formal insolvency proceed - ings commence, enforcement becomes effectively impossible except for financial collateral, making timing critical. Beyond this legal barrier, reputational concerns weigh heavily in Norway’s relatively small and relationship-focused business community, where aggressive enforcement can damage a lender’s mar - ket reputation and future deal flow.

201 CHAMBERS.COM

Powered by