LATVIA Law and Practice Contributed by: Edward Kuznetsov, Marine Legal Bureau
maintained within the Latvian ship registration sys - tem (administered under the maritime administration framework). Documentary requirements generally include: • evidence of the underlying secured obligation and mortgage instrument; • identification of the parties; • details sufficient to identify the vessel; and • compliance with formal requirements applicable to documents submitted for registration (including legalisation/translation where required for foreign documents). 1.7 Ship Ownership and Mortgages Registry The Latvian ship ownership and mortgages registry is maintained as an official register and provides public - ity of registered rights and encumbrances. Access and the method of obtaining extracts or viewing entries depend on the applicable registry procedure (eg, requesting an extract or certificate, and satisfying any formal request requirements). In practice, third parties commonly rely on official registry extracts/certificates to verify ownership and registered security interests. Ship financing in Latvia largely follows international market practice. Debt financing is typically document - ed on the basis of standard facility structures (facility agreement, security documents, representations/war - ranties, covenants, events of default and enforcement provisions). Equity financing is implemented through shareholder instruments and corporate structuring under Latvian commercial law. Where the vessel is Latvian-registered, a ship mort - gage is a key security element, supplemented in prac - tice by a wider security package such as assignment of earnings and insurances, pledges over accounts and (where available) share pledges over the owning SPV. The most common transactions are conventional bank lending structures and cross-border financings 2. Ship Finance and Leasing 2.1 Ship Loan Finance
involving foreign lenders, with Latvian elements mainly arising where a Latvian registry mortgage or Latvian corporate/security law is used. 2.2 Ship Leasing Latvia is not typically used as a primary hub for ship leasing in the way certain larger maritime jurisdictions are; leasing structures involving Latvian parties are more often driven by cross-border commercial con - siderations rather than domestic incentives. From a legal perspective, the lessor/lessee relation - ship is based on contractual possession and title retention by the lessor, whereas lender/borrower structures typically involve borrower ownership with security granted to the lender (eg, a mortgage). In enforcement, mortgage-related remedies focus on secured creditor enforcement against the vessel, while leasing defaults are addressed through contractual termination and repossession remedies, subject to procedural requirements and (where relevant) interim relief. Sale and leaseback structures may be used in practice where commercially justified, but they are not a dominant feature of Latvia-linked shipping activity. 3. Marine Casualties and Owners’ Liability 3.1 International Conventions: Pollution and Wreck Removal Latvia applies the principal international conventions governing marine pollution and environmental liability through a combination of international law, EU legisla - tion and domestic implementation. Pollution preven - tion and liability are primarily regulated via Latvia’s participation in the International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships, 1973 (MARPOL), as implemented through EU instruments and national legislation, which impose obligations relating to pre - vention, reporting, clean-up and sanctions for non- compliance. Liability for pollution damage and related response costs is generally imposed on the ship-owner or other responsible interests, subject to applicable limitation regimes. Wreck-related obligations, including mark - ing and removal of wrecks and recovery of associ -
330 CHAMBERS.COM
Powered by FlippingBook