LATVIA Law and Practice Contributed by: Edward Kuznetsov, Marine Legal Bureau
Seafarers’ rights and safety are governed primarily by the Maritime Code, together with labour and occupa - tional safety legislation applicable to maritime employ - ment. The regulatory framework covers matters such as minimum working and living conditions, employ - ment agreements, wages, repatriation, medical care, occupational safety and social protection. Compliance with the MLC is monitored and enforced by the competent maritime and labour authorities, including through flag state and port state control inspections. Ship-owners may incur civil, adminis - trative and, in serious cases, other liabilities for non- compliance with seafarers’ safety and welfare require - ments, subject to the applicable legal framework. Latvia applies the Hague Rules/Hague-Visby Rules regime to carriage evidenced by bills of lading where the relevant connecting factors are satisfied. Latvia is not a party to the Hamburg Rules and has not adopted the Rotterdam Rules. Where the international regime does not apply, car - riage by sea and bills of lading are primarily governed by the Latvian Maritime Code, supplemented (where necessary) by general principles of the Civil Law and procedural aspects under the Civil Procedure Law. 4.2 Title to Sue on a Bill of Lading The right to sue on a bill of lading generally lies with the lawful holder of the bill (typically the consignee or endorsee in possession), depending on the form of the bill and the underlying contractual structure. Latvian law recognises transfer/assignment of rights: title to sue may pass with the lawful transfer of the bill of lading and/or by assignment under general civil law principles, provided that the requirements for a valid transfer (including notice where relevant) are satisfied. 4.3 Ship-Owners’ Liability and Limitation of Liability for Cargo Damages 4. Cargo Claims 4.1 Bills of Lading Liability for cargo loss or damage depends on whether the ship-owner is the contractual carrier under the bill of lading or is involved as the actual/performing car -
rier (eg, via charterparty arrangements). As a matter of principle, claims under a bill of lading are pursued against the contractual carrier identified by the bill and the applicable carriage regime; recourse may then arise upstream under the charterparty chain. Where the Hague/Hague-Visby regime applies, the carrier’s liability is subject to the customary defences and package/unit limitation under that regime. In addi - tion, ship-owners (where entitled and depending on the nature of the claim) may invoke limitation of liability under the LLMC 1976/1996, as implemented in Lat - vian law, for qualifying claims. Accordingly, the analysis differs materially where the ship-owner is the contractual carrier (direct bill of lad - ing liability) versus where it is only the actual carrier (exposure primarily through tort/contractual recourse pathways and indemnities). 4.4 Misdeclaration of Cargo Latvian law recognises carrier claims against shippers for misdeclaration/misdescription of cargo (including incorrect description, quantity, weight, dangerous nature or other material particulars) where the carrier can prove breach of the shipper’s duties and causa - tion of loss (eg, fines, delay, damage, clean-up costs, deviation consequences). The legal basis typically arises under the contractual framework (bill of lading/ booking note/charterparty), supplemented by general civil law principles on breach, fault and damages. As to case law, publicly available Latvian judgments in this narrow shipping niche are limited and highly fact- specific; outcomes depend on the evidential record (documentation, knowledge, due diligence, causation) and the contractual allocation of risk (including incor - poration of international standard clauses). In practice, these disputes are more frequently resolved through negotiation or foreign arbitration/litigation mecha - nisms, rather than reported Latvian court decisions. 4.5 Time Bar for Filing Claims for Damaged or Lost Cargo Where the Hague/Hague-Visby regime applies, the typical time bar for cargo claims is one year, subject to the specific rules of that regime and to any agreed extension.
332 CHAMBERS.COM
Powered by FlippingBook