CHINA Law and Practice Contributed by: Peibing Qi, Na Gao and Shanshan Heng, Fangda Partners
adjudication systems steadily and prudently”. The court reaffirmed that artificial intelligence must main- tain its auxiliary role, stressing that judicial account- ability rests solely with the judge. This indicates that the application of artificial intelligence must proceed under regulatory guidance to ensure that technology consistently serves the judiciary without replacing the independent judgement of human judges. Overall, artificial intelligence in China’s dispute resolu- tion is expected to continue developing in the direc- tion of greater efficiency while remaining anchored within a regulatory-led framework. Its promotion and application will be closely linked to the state’s invest- ment in judicial digitalisation.
115 CHAMBERS.COM
Powered by FlippingBook