Litigation 2026

BRAZIL Law and Practice Contributed by: Arthur Villamil and Yuri Luna Dias, Villamil Advogados

8.2 Settlement of Lawsuits and Confidentiality A lawsuit settlement may remain confidential, but with certain limitations depending on the nature of the case and the judge’s discretion. If the parties reach an out- of-court settlement before any lawsuit is filed, they can include a confidentiality clause to keep the terms of the agreement private. In these cases, the settle- ment remains confidential between the parties, unless there is a need for judicial enforcement. When parties reach a settlement during the course of a lawsuit and submit it for judicial approval, they can request that the court keep the terms of the agree- ment confidential. The judge has discretion to grant or deny such a request based on the circumstances of the case. If the court agrees to the parties’ request for confidentiality, the case records, including the set- tlement terms, may be sealed. This means that the details of the settlement would not be accessible to the public. However, sealed records are generally an exception and not the norm, as transparency is a fun- damental principle of the Brazilian judicial system. 8.3 Enforcement of Settlement Agreements Settlement agreements can be enforced either judi- cially or extrajudicially, depending on their formalisa- tion. When a settlement is approved by a court during an ongoing lawsuit, it has the same effect as a judg- ment. If one party fails to comply with its terms, the other party can request enforcement directly through the court, without the need for a new lawsuit. Extrajudicial settlements, reached out of court, can also be enforced if they are properly formalised in writing and signed by both parties. To enforce these agreements, the aggrieved party must initiate an enforcement action, allowing the court to compel compliance through measures like asset seizure or bank account freezing. Court-approved settlements generally face fewer challenges during enforcement, while extrajudicial agreements require specific legal criteria to be met to be enforceable. 8.4 Setting Aside Settlement Agreements Setting aside a settlement agreement is possible but generally challenging. Courts prioritise the stability

and finality of settlements, especially those approved during judicial proceedings. However, there are spe- cific circumstances under which a settlement agree- ment can be invalidated or rescinded. Grounds for annulment include fraud, coercion, sig- nificant mistakes, illegality, or the incapacity of a party, such as minors. For court-approved settlements, a rescission action must be filed within two years, and the burden of proof is on the party seeking annulment. If annulled, the parties are restored to their original positions, and the dispute may resume. 9. Damages and Judgment 9.1 Awards Available to the Successful Litigant A successful litigant can receive various forms of awards depending on the nature of the dispute. Com- mon remedies include monetary damages, such as compensatory damages to cover actual losses and, in certain cases, moral damages for non-material harm like emotional distress. Specific performance is another key remedy, where the court orders a party to fulfil specific obligations, like delivering goods or performing contractual duties, especially when monetary compensation is insuffi- cient. Courts can also issue injunctive relief, either as preliminary measures to maintain the status quo or as permanent orders to prevent a party from certain actions or to compel specific behaviour after a full trial. Declaratory relief allows courts to clarify the rights and duties of the parties, providing legal certainty in matters like contract interpretation or property rights without necessarily awarding damages. Additionally, courts can order the rescission of contracts or annul- ment of legal acts when agreements are found to be void due to fraud, mistake, or breach. Finally, the winning party may recover court costs and legal fees under Brazil’s “loser pays” principle, where the losing party must cover the expenses of litigation. These awards are designed to ensure that the suc-

108 CHAMBERS.COM

Powered by