USA Law and Practice Contributed by: Courtney Scobie and Jack Edwards, Ajamie LLP
8.4 Setting Aside Settlement Agreements Settlement agreements in the USA can be set aside or invalidated in certain circumstances. The process for setting aside a settlement agreement involves legal proceedings and is subject to specific criteria. Some common grounds on which settlement agreements may be set aside include fraud or misrepresentation, duress or undue influence, lack of capacity, mutual mistake, material breach of the settlement agreement, or a public policy violation. Setting aside a settlement agreement is uncommon and requires a legal process in court. The party seek- ing to set aside the agreement must provide evidence supporting their claim. 9. Damages and Judgment 9.1 Awards Available to the Successful Litigant The following are among the most common forms of awards and remedies available to successful litigants. • Monetary damages – successful litigants may be awarded monetary damages, which are intended to compensate them for losses incurred due to the defendant’s actions. The types of monetary dam- ages include: (a) compensatory damages – these compensate the plaintiff for actual economic losses, such as medical expenses, lost wages, property dam- age, or other quantifiable losses; and (b) punitive damages – in cases of wilful miscon- duct or egregious behaviour, punitive damages may be awarded to punish the defendant and deter similar conduct in the future. • Equitable remedies – in some cases, a successful litigant may seek equitable remedies, which aim to provide fair and just relief rather than monetary compensation. These remedies include: (a) injunctions – an injunction is a court order that requires a party to take certain actions or refrain from certain actions and can be used to prevent future harm, compel specific perfor- mance, or protect legal rights; and (b) specific performance – specific performance is an equitable remedy that requires a party to ful-
• cases with structured settlements; and • probate matters.
8.2 Settlement of Lawsuits and Confidentiality In the USA, the settlement of a lawsuit can be con- fidential if the parties involved agree to include con- fidentiality provisions in their settlement agreement. These provisions are commonly referred to as confi- dentiality or non-disclosure clauses. They are contrac- tual terms that the parties negotiate and agree upon as part of the settlement process. Even though confidential settlements are common, there is debate about their social and legal implica- tions. Some argue that they can shield misconduct or dangerous products from the public, whereas others argue they protect the privacy and interests of the parties involved. The enforceability of these provi- sions can depend on state law and the specifics of the agreement. 8.3 Enforcement of Settlement Agreements Settlement agreements in the USA are enforced as contracts. Once the parties involved in a lawsuit reach a settlement and sign the agreement, it becomes a legally binding contract. The enforcement of settlement agreements generally follows the following principles. • Contractual obligation – a settlement agreement is a contract between the parties and, as such, is legally binding. Each party is obligated to fulfil the terms and conditions in the agreement. • Filing a lawsuit for breach – to enforce a settlement agreement, the aggrieved party typically files a law- suit for breach of contract in the appropriate court. The aggrieved party must demonstrate that the other party failed to meet their contractual obliga- tions as outlined in the settlement agreement. • State laws and jurisdiction – the enforcement of settlement agreements is subject to state contract law, as contract law is primarily governed at the state level. Courts in the state where the lawsuit was originally filed usually have jurisdiction over the enforcement of the settlement agreement.
1202 CHAMBERS.COM
Powered by FlippingBook