USA Law and Practice Contributed by: Courtney Scobie and Jack Edwards, Ajamie LLP
• Appellate briefs – the appellant and the appellee (the party responding to the appeal) file appel- late briefs presenting their legal arguments and responses. These briefs outline the issues on appeal and the legal basis for challenging or defending the lower court’s decision. • Oral argument (if scheduled) – in some cases, the appellate court schedules oral arguments, which allow the parties’ attorneys to present their argu- ments to a panel of judges. Oral argument provides an opportunity for parties to further explain their positions and for the judges to question the attor- neys. • Appellate decision – the appellate court reviews the case and issues a written decision, either affirming, reversing, or remanding the lower court’s decision. The decision may contain legal analysis and reasoning. The triggering events for filing an appeal are as fol- lows. • Entry of final judgment – in most cases, the trigger for filing an appeal is the entry of a final judgment or order by the district court. This marks the com- pletion of the trial court proceedings. • Interlocutory appeals – in some cases, parties may seek interlocutory appeals for non-final orders, which can include decisions on preliminary injunc- tions, qualified immunity, or other matters. 10.4 Issues Considered by the Appeal Court at an Appeal Federal appellate courts in the USA consider a range of issues during an appeal. The scope of review is generally limited to matters that were raised and pre- served in the trial court. Federal appellate courts may consider legal issues and questions of law, including: • interpretation and application of federal statutes and regulations; • constitutional issues; • questions of jurisdiction and venue; and • legal errors made during trial proceedings, such as improper evidentiary rulings, jury instructions or application of legal standards.
Appellate review is generally limited to the record in the trial court, which includes transcripts of trial pro- ceedings and any relevant exhibits. New evidence is typically not considered on appeal. 10.5 Court-Imposed Conditions on Granting an Appeal Federal appellate courts in the USA generally do not impose conditions on granting an appeal as a matter of routine practice. Instead, the decision to grant or deny an appeal is primarily based on the merits of the case and whether it meets the criteria for appellate review. The appeals process is primarily focused on review- ing the trial court’s decision on its merits, rather than imposing conditions for the mere act of granting an appeal. Appellate courts make their decisions based on the rules of appellate procedure and legal stand- ards governing appellate review. On appeal, parties typically address specific legal issues or errors that they raised during the trial court proceedings. 10.6 Powers of the Appellate Court After an Appeal Hearing After hearing an appeal, appellate courts in the USA have several powers and options, depending on the specific circumstances and the nature of the case. These powers are designed to address legal errors, ensure fairness, and provide remedies when neces- sary. An appellate court can affirm, reverse or modify a final judgment either in whole or in part. An appellate court can also remand a matter back to the trial court for further proceedings, such as addi- tional fact finding or correction of legal errors. 11. Costs 11.1 Responsibility for Paying the Costs of Litigation In general, in the USA, each party bears their own attorney’s fees and costs. It is not a “loser pays” sys- tem unless provided for by statute or contract. In some cases, specific statutes or contracts may provide for the recovery of attorney’s fees and costs
1205 CHAMBERS.COM
Powered by FlippingBook