KENYA Trends and Developments Contributed by: John M. Ohaga, SC and Joy Wanyika, TripleOKLaw Advocates
ness to enforce these corporate governance require - ments as part of procedural discipline. In Chemelil Sugar Football Club and Kenya Premier League Limited v Nick Mwendwa and others , SDT Case No 7 of 2020, the Tribunal addressed the issue of authority to commence proceedings, including the need for proper resolutions where a company is the claimant. This trend is commercially important because it forces clubs and leagues to align legal action with corporate governance, thereby reducing the risk of rogue litigation and improving certainty for counterparties. For boards and investors, this reinforces a practi - cal point. If disputes are likely, organisations should ensure that their governance documentation is up to date, that decision-making is properly minuted, and that authority levels are clear. This is particularly important for entities regulated under the Companies Act, No 17 of 2015, where corporate capacity and authority are central to litigation decisions. Constitutional values are shaping sports justice, even when disputes are “private” The Sports Disputes Tribunal is unique because it operates at the intersection of private sporting rules and Kenya’s constitutional legal order. Even where a dispute arises from a private contract or an internal federation decision, the Tribunal’s statutory founda - tion encourages a decision-making culture that is con - sistent with constitutional standards. The most relevant constitutional anchors in sports dis - putes typically include access to justice under Article 48 of the Constitution of Kenya 2010, the right to a fair hearing under Article 50 of the Constitution of Kenya 2010, and the national value favouring alternative dis - pute resolution under Article 159 of the Constitution of Kenya 2010. In governance-related disputes, parties often implicitly raise issues connected to fair admin - istrative action under Article 47 of the Constitution of Kenya 2010, particularly where a federation’s decision affects rights, status, eligibility, or participation. From a business perspective, this constitutional influ - ence increases compliance expectations for sports organisations. It also gives athletes and clubs greater
confidence that disputes will be assessed through a fairness lens, not only through internal politics or technicalities. What clients should do differently in light of these trends Clients operating in Kenya’s sports market should treat SDT risk and SDT opportunity as part of their standard regulatory and commercial planning. The Tribunal is becoming a central forum for resolving governance, competition, and employment-related disputes, and the practical effect is that legal readiness can be a competitive advantage. The following actions are increasingly important: • ensuring dispute resolution clauses are realistic, workable, and matched to actual institutional capacity, especially where internal arbitration or committees are named; • building documentary discipline into governance, including notices, minutes, registers, eligibility decisions, and correspondence trails; • planning for accelerated dispute timelines, includ - ing maintaining rapid response capability for injunction-style applications and urgent hearings; • conducting periodic governance audits for clubs, leagues, and federations, particularly ahead of elections, licensing windows, and season transi - tions; and • aligning litigation decisions with corporate authority requirements, including board resolutions and clear mandates to external counsel. These steps reduce the risk of being caught off guard by urgent disputes, and they also strengthen a party’s credibility if a dispute reaches the Tribunal. Outlook: why the Tribunal’s uniqueness is likely to become more important The SDT’s uniqueness is likely to matter even more over the next few years as sport becomes more com - mercially complex and as disputes become more multi-layered. Sponsorship contracts, broadcasting, digital rights, betting-related integrity concerns, and athlete representation arrangements can all generate disputes that require fast, sector-literate adjudication. The Tribunal’s ability to combine specialised focus
203 CHAMBERS.COM
Powered by FlippingBook