KENYA Trends and Developments Contributed by: John M. Ohaga, SC and Joy Wanyika, TripleOKLaw Advocates
with public law discipline positions it as an increas - ingly influential institution in Kenya’s sports economy. At the same time, the Tribunal’s approach raises the bar for internal sports justice systems. If internal mechanisms are to remain credible and respected, they must be timely, independent, and procedurally fair in a way that can withstand scrutiny. Where that standard is not met, the Tribunal’s jurisprudence sug - gests it will continue to prioritise effective access to remedies over procedural ritual. Conclusion Kenya’s Sports Disputes Tribunal is unique because it functions as a specialist statutory forum that resolves sports disputes through a blend of sector understand - ing, purposive statutory interpretation, and constitu - tional values. Its recent decisions show a consistent trend toward practical justice, particularly in handling jurisdiction, exhaustion, preliminary objections, and sports employment disputes under Section 58 of the Sports Act, No 25 of 2013. The Tribunal is also rein - forcing governance discipline by requiring credible internal processes and proper authority for corporate claimants.
For clients, the practical message is straightforward. Sports disputes in Kenya should be anticipated, planned for, and managed with the expectation that the SDT will be an active forum that can move quickly and focus on substance. Those who invest in govern - ance compliance, contract clarity, and dispute readi - ness are better positioned to protect their sporting and commercial interests and maintain competitive stability in Kenya’s evolving sports market.
204 CHAMBERS.COM
Powered by FlippingBook