ISRAEL Law and Practice Contributed by: Joseph (Yossi) Ashkenazi, Haim Machluf and Roy Schondorf, Herzog Fox & Neeman
• The award has not yet become binding on the parties, or has been set aside or suspended by a competent court located in the jurisdiction of which, or under the law of which, the award was made (this appears only in Article 45 (objection to enforcement) and not under Article 43 (revocation of an Award issued in Israel)). • The matter was not capable of settlement by way of arbitration, or it would be contrary to public policy to recognise or enforce the award.
In conclusion, when it comes to foreign judgments, Israeli courts adopt a cautious yet co-operative stance. While they recognise the importance of inter - national legal reciprocity, enforcement is granted only when it aligns with key domestic principles such as fairness, sovereignty, and public policy. This balanced approach underscores Israel’s role as a jurisdiction that values both international engagement and the protection of its legal order.
250 CHAMBERS.COM
Powered by FlippingBook