KENYA Trends and Developments Contributed by: Stella Muraguri, Linet Okaka and Pride Kabue, MMW Advocates LLP
MMW Advocates LLP 511 MMW Chambers Mugoiri Road Kileleshwa P.O. Box 59722-00100 Nairobi Kenya
Tel: +254 776314659 Email: info@mmw.legal Web: mmw.legal
Regulatory landscape and compliance developments in Kenya’s fintech sector
From Mobile Money to AI Lending: The Evolution and Regulatory Gaps in Kenya’s Fintech Sector Introduction: a look into fintech evolution in Kenya The global fintech market was valued at USD320.81 billion in 2025 and projected to reach USD460.76 bil - lion in 2026. Against this backdrop, Kenya’s fintech landscape has been widely celebrated, yet its regula - tory framework has often lagged behind its innovation trajectory. Rather than proactive regulation, Kenya has historically adopted a reactive posture. A clear example is virtual assets, which operated for years in regulatory ambiguity. Formal oversight only began to accelerate after Kenya was grey‑listed by the Financial Action Task Force (FATF). This was not pro - active governance – it was corrective action spurred by international pressure. Kenya is firmly positioned among Africa’s top four fin - tech and cryptocurrency adoption markets, alongside South Africa, Nigeria, and Egypt. Within East Africa, it remains the undisputed hub of fintech innovation and adoption. Kenya’s fintech success has been transformative for financial inclusion. Technology has enabled millions of previously unbanked individuals to access finan - cial services. In 2024, over 26.9 million adults out of the estimated 33.6 million had access to formal finan - cial services, compared to just 4.6 million in 2006. This progress has been fueled by widespread mobile money adoption, reduced transaction barriers, and the ubiquity of mobile phones.
Fintech in Kenya operates under multiple regulatory regimes covering banking, payments, digital credit, data protection, AML/CFT, capital markets, and tel - ecommunications. While this fragmentation allows sector‑specific oversight, it also introduces overlap, ambiguity, and inefficiency. As fintech increasingly converges with tradition - al finance, the distinction between “conventional finance” and “digital finance” becomes less mean - ingful. Kenya may therefore need to consider a unified and harmonised legislative framework that integrates traditional banking, digital finance, payments, virtual assets, and emerging technologies under one coher - ent regulatory structure. Such an approach would enhance predictability, consumer protection, systemic oversight, and investor confidence. Yet a deeper question arises: how can regulators effectively govern a sector that evolves faster than the law itself? Legislation is slow and consultative; innovation is rapid and borderless. Without adap - tive, principle‑based, technology‑neutral regulatory design, Kenya risks either stifling innovation or per - petually chasing it. Anti‑Money Laundering and Counter‑Terrorism Regulation On 10 June 2025, the European Commission added Kenya to its list of high‑risk third countries due to AML/CFT/CPF deficiencies. This followed Kenya’s continued FATF grey‑listing. The listing was more than
482 CHAMBERS.COM
Powered by FlippingBook