POLAND Trends and Developments Contributed by: Jaroslaw Kruk and Joanna Bogdanska, KW Kruk and Partners Law Firm
Directive (EU) 2024/1260 – a new era in asset recovery architecture The recently adopted Directive (EU) 2024/1260 marks a paradigm shift in the EU-wide asset recovery framework. For Poland, this entails the mandatory transposition of enhanced investiga - tive powers, non-conviction-based confiscation mechanisms and a national strategy for the pro - active identification and management of criminal assets. The directive also obliges member states to create or reinforce specialised Asset Recov - ery Offices (AROs), with inter-agency access to real-time financial and asset registers, including land registries, company ownership records and crypto-asset tracing systems. Strategic challenges – co-ordination, capacity and case law development Despite legislative advances, key bottlenecks persist in Poland’s asset recovery ecosystem. These include fragmented inter-agency co-
ordination, limited specialisation in economic crime units, and the slow pace of jurisprudential development on key issues such as extended confiscation, third-party rights and reversal of the burden of proof in asset forfeiture. Practitioners should also note the growing importance of EU jurisprudence in shaping domestic case law, especially regarding pro - portionality and procedural safeguards in asset restraint measures. Conclusion Poland stands at a critical juncture in the devel - opment of its anti-fraud and asset recovery architecture. While legislative convergence with EU standards is well underway, the true test lies in operational effectiveness, cross-sectoral co- ordination and the judiciary’s ability to adapt to the complexities of transnational financial crime. For practitioners, this presents both a challenge and an opportunity to shape the future of asset recovery in the region.
296 CHAMBERS.COM
Powered by FlippingBook