ITALY Law and Practice Contributed by: Filippo Pacciani and Antonio D’Arcangelo, Legance
6. Standing 6.1 Requirements for Administrative Law Challenges To bring a challenge before administrative courts, a claimant must meet the following requirements: • legal standing, meaning a differentiated and qualified legal position compared to the gen - eral community; and • interest to challenge, defined as the claim - ant’s benefit in having the Administrative Decision annulled or reformed through the challenge. This must arise from harm to the claimant’s position caused by the challenged administrative measure and must exist both at the time the challenge is brought and until the final decision. 6.2 Charities and NGOs Associations and charities may challenge Admin - istrative Decisions to protect collective interests, provided they meet certain criteria assessed by administrative courts on a case-by-case basis. These criteria include effective representative - ness, statutory purposes and stability (rather than occasional activities).
cific compliance constraints on certain activities, making them susceptible of being challenged.
4. Nature of the Decision-Maker 4.1 Judicial Review of Commercial and Non-Governmental Decisions When a Public Administration acts in accordance with civil law rules (without exercising admin - istrative powers) and engages in commercial activities, any decision or action is only suscepti - ble to challenge before civil courts according the rules of civil law. As previously mentioned, while the awarding of a contract is always an admin - istrative act, the execution of the contract falls under civil law (see 3.4 Agreements Between Private Entities and Public Bodies ). 5. Ouster 5.1 Legislative or Contractual Limits on Judicial Review The jurisdiction of administrative courts cannot be ousted by legislation or by contract, as the Italian Constitution guarantees the right of every individual to seek legal remedy before adminis - trative courts against Administrative Decisions. However, disputes involving rights devolved to administrative court jurisdiction ( “exclusive juris- diction” , see 2.1 Determining Susceptibility ) may be deferred by the parties to an arbitration.
7. Other Parties 7.1 Joinder
Anyone with an interest connected to a pending administrative claim may intervene in the pro - ceedings. Such an interest arises when the out - come of the challenge (upholding or rejection) could indirectly benefit the intervener. Interven - tions can support either the claimant (interven - tion ad adiuvandum) or the defendant (interven - tion ad opponendum).
172 CHAMBERS.COM
Powered by FlippingBook