CANADA Trends and Developments Contributed by: Brent Arnold, Carole Piovesan, Tamara Adler, Michael Pascu and Dilan Brar, INQ Law
Practical priorities Three steps are recommended under both current and anticipated law. An inventory of AI systems in deploy - ment, classified by risk and jurisdictional exposure, is the necessary first step and prerequisite for the impact assessments Law 25 already requires. Trans - fer impact assessments for personal information dis - closed to US-parented service providers should be completed immediately; the analysis will support the cross-border documentation the PPCDA will require federally. CLOUD Act response protocols should be incorporated into vendor due diligence and master service agreements, addressing what data would be produced, under what process, and with what notice to affected individuals and regulators. The PPCDA’s proposed privacy management pro - gramme and documentation requirements for auto - mated decisions are the most reliable design template for governance frameworks being built today. Organi - sations that align their programmes to the proposed federal standard will satisfy current OPC enforcement expectations and be better positioned when the new legislation comes into force.
agreements governing AI tools are being treated as already required under existing law. The OPC has des - ignated AI governance a priority enforcement area, and the PPCDA’s forthcoming mandatory privacy management programme will codify obligations that well-governed organisations are already meeting. Cloud procurement carries legal exposure The most structurally difficult compliance problem arises from the interaction between Canadian privacy law and the US Clarifying Lawful Overseas Use of Data Act (CLOUD Act), which authorises US federal law enforcement to compel American cloud provid - ers to disclose customer data regardless of where it is stored (subject to the signing of a bilateral treaty, which has been under negotiation for some time). A Canadian data residency contractual term will not constitute a legal barrier to a valid CLOUD Act order. The Upper Harbour Canadian Technology Sovereignty Index 2026 found that 80% of tools offering Canadian data residency remain CLOUD Act-exposed because their parent entities are US-incorporated; a grow - ing number of Canadian organisations are therefore actively migrating away from US cloud providers. Quebec’s transfer impact assessment requirement has applied since September 2023, and Bill C-36 would introduce an equivalent federal obligation. Sur - vey evidence suggests most organisations subject to the Quebec requirement have yet to complete even their first assessment. Canada’s EU adequacy status, re-confirmed in January 2024, is contingent on main - taining protections broadly equivalent to the GDPR; a prolonged gap between PIPEDA and the PPCDA’s coming into force could invite review with material consequences for transatlantic data flows.
159 CHAMBERS.COM
Powered by FlippingBook