STOCKHOLM REGIONAL DIVISION Law and Practice Contributed by: Peter Kenamets, Fredrik Lüning and Linnéa Hedström, Lind Edlund Kenamets Intellectual Property AB
6.4 Improvements to the UPC No content provided in this jurisdiction.
Similarly to what was discussed above, it is also conceivable that scenarios exist where a pat - ent holder’s opportunity to leverage an injunc - tion gap is greater or more significant before a national court than before the UPC. This would in such cases argue in favour of national courts over the UPC. It is plausible that patent holders will consider this aspect when devising strategies for disputes of an international nature, potentially leading to an increase in proceedings before national courts, both in Sweden and elsewhere.
138 CHAMBERS.COM
Powered by FlippingBook