MALAYSIA Trends and Developments Contributed by: Dato’ Brian Law, Suaran Singh Sidhu, Ashwinathan Selvanathan and Jannah Khairul, LAW Partnership
public interests and ensuring compliance with legal standards. Latest trends Before the COVID-19 pandemic, counterfeit alcohol was predominantly sold at brick-and- mortar stores. Stock was typically stored on the premises, making business owners or landlords relatively easy to identify and locate. With the rise of e-commerce platforms dur - ing the pandemic, counterfeit alcohol sellers adapted their methods. Vendors now no longer provide return addresses and the separation of storing and packing facilities make tracking them more challenging. Moreover, counterfeit labels and stickers can now be easily procured through international platforms and shipped into Malaysia without significant scrutiny. After the pandemic, the sale of counterfeit alcohol has shifted further toward clandestine methods. Transactions are now often carried out through runners or mobile applications. Promo - tions are primarily conducted via chat appli - cations like WhatsApp, with payments made directly to sellers, often using proxy accounts. Deliveries are handled by third-party logistics providers, leaving no traceable seller details. Recent discoveries, such as counterfeit glass bottles found in East Malaysia, suggest the possible large-scale entry of counterfeit spirits into Malaysia. These developments underline the increasing sophistication and scale of coun - terfeit alcohol operations in the country, posing significant risks to public health and safety. Implications of illicit alcohol The widespread availability of illicit alcohol in Malaysia has significant and far-reaching impli - cations across multiple sectors, including public
health, government revenue, societal trust and national security. Illicit alcohol often contains toxic substances such as methanol, antifreeze, nail polish remover and even paint stripper. Manufactured in unsani - tary conditions with potentially hazardous ingre - dients, counterfeit alcohol poses serious health risks, including blindness, organ failure, coma and even death. The consumption of these dan - gerous products places a substantial burden on the public healthcare system, requiring signifi - cant allocation of public funds to treat cases of acute poisoning and other health emergencies. Counterfeit alcohol evade taxation entirely, resulting in a significant loss of government tax revenue. While the government loses out on these unpaid taxes, it simultaneously incurs sub - stantial enforcement costs to curb counterfeit - ing activities. This dual financial impact weakens fiscal stability and diverts resources from other critical areas of governance. Furthermore, counterfeiters exploit the IP of established brands, diluting their market pres - ence and eroding consumer trust. Customers often struggle to distinguish between genuine and counterfeit products, resulting in dissat - isfaction and potential reputational damage to trusted brands. This undermines consumer confidence in the overall market and creates an uneven playing field for legitimate businesses. Additionally, counterfeiting has become one of the fastest-growing forms of economic crime globally, driven by a combination of high profits and low penalties. Profits generated from coun - terfeit alcohol often fund organised criminal networks, enabling these syndicates to grow in power and sophistication. This escalation poses a significant challenge for authorities tasked with
314 CHAMBERS.COM
Powered by FlippingBook